Bindinglaw

DC · rules

D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 69-II

Particular Provisions for Attachments of Wages After Judgment

activein force · 2017-05-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) APPLICABILITY. The provisions of this rule do not supersede or repeal any other

rule of this court unless in express conflict and must apply only to attachments issued

pursuant to D.C. Code §§ 16-571 to -584 (2012 Repl.) and 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.

(b) REPORTING CREDITS AGAINST JUDGMENT. It is the duty of a judgment creditor

who is receiving payments on account of the judgment from an employer-garnishee and

who will receive credits upon said judgment from a source other than said employer-garnishee to notify said employer-garnishee and the clerk in writing of such receipt

within 14 days, including the date, amount, and source.

(c) SCHEDULE AND RECEIPT FOR PAYMENTS. Every judgment creditor receiving

payments from an employer-garnishee pursuant to the issuance of a wage attachment

is obligated to credit the payments first against the accrued interest on the unpaid

balance of the judgment, if any, second on the principal amount of the judgment, and

third on those attorney's fees and costs actually assessed in the cause, and must send

a receipt to the garnishee within 7 days after such payment, which receipt must set forth

the application of such payment pursuant to the schedule above.

(d) NONCOMPLIANCE. If any judgment creditor fails to comply with this rule or with the

statutory provisions cited in Rule 69-II(a), the court may in its discretion, on motion of

any interested party:

(1) enter an order vacating and setting aside the attachment and continuing levy of

said judgment creditor then in force and effect, but without prejudice to the refiling and

serving of another attachment, which must follow prior attachment of wages of the

judgment debtor in the hands of the same employer-garnishee; and

(2) enter a judgment of a reasonable attorney's fee and tax costs in favor of the party

filing the motion to vacate and set aside the attachment.

History

COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS Stylistic changes were made to this rule to conform with the 2007 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Also, time periods were adjusted to reflect the new time computation method in Rule 6. Finally, the section regarding dockets cards has been eliminated as obsolete. COMMENT Rule 69-II contains certain specific provisions with respect to post judgment attachments.

Provenance

Source
dccourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
8d0b8779e49ad0aa63a9bc61d0f758802d0709a70efcc9dfe8dbb84f0980126e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 69-II — Particular Provisions… · binding.law