DC · rules
D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 58
Entering Judgment
(a) SEPARATE DOCUMENT. Every judgment and amended judgment must be set out
in a separate document, but a separate document is not required for an order disposing
of a motion:
(1) for judgment under Rule 50(b);
(2) to amend or make additional findings under Rule 52(b);
(3) for attorney’s fees under Rule 54;
(4) for a new trial, or to alter or amend the judgment, under Rule 59; or
(5) for relief under Rule 60.
(b) ENTERING JUDGMENT.
(1) Without the Court’s Direction. Subject to Rule 54(b) and unless the court or
administrative order requires otherwise, the clerk must, without awaiting the court’s
direction, promptly prepare, sign, and enter judgment when:
(A) the jury returns a general verdict;
(B) the court awards only costs or a sum certain; or
(C) the court denies all relief.
(2) Court’s Approval Required. Subject to Rule 54(b), the court must promptly approve
the form of the judgment, which the clerk must promptly enter, when:
(A) the jury returns a special verdict or a general verdict with answers to questions;
or
(B) the court grants other relief not described in Rule 58(b).
(c) TIME OF ENTRY. For purposes of these rules, judgment is entered at the following
times:
(1) if a separate document is not required, when the judgment is entered in the civil
docket under Rule 79(a); or
(2) if a separate document is required, when the judgment is entered in the civil
docket under Rule 79(a) and the earlier of these events occurs:
(A) it is set out in a separate document; or
(B) 150 days have run from the entry in the civil docket.
(d) REQUEST FOR ENTRY. A party may request that judgment be set out in a separate
document as required by Rule 58(a).
(e) COST OR FEE AWARDS. Ordinarily, the entry of judgment may not be delayed, nor
the time for appeal extended, in order to tax costs or award fees. But if a timely motion
for attorney’s fees is made under Rule 54(d)(2), the court may act before a notice of
appeal has been filed and become effective to order that the motion have the same
effect under District of Columbia Court of Appeals Rule 4(a)(4) as a timely motion under
Rule 59.
History
COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS This rule is identical to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, as amended in 2007, except that subsection (b)(1) references administrative orders and section (e) references the District of Columbia Court of Appeals rule. COMMENT Identical to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
Provenance
- Source
- dccourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
c1f3f852191eed3f6083c3e4a22265bc58e6c5d18fd1428ede3a00f94ed6361d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.