DC · rules
D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 54-II
Waiver of Costs, Fees, or Security
(a) IN GENERAL. The court may waive the payment of costs, fees, or security relating
to any action on the filing of the Application to Waive Court Costs and Fees form
provided by the court. The application must be signed and sworn or affirmed in
accordance with the declaration language on the form. Notarization is not required.
Unless the court orders otherwise, the application need not be served on the other
parties and will be resolved ex parte. When an application is approved (in whole or in
part) or denied, a notation will be made in the docket.
(b) WAIVERS BY STATUTE. The court or the clerk must approve the application,
without requiring additional information from the applicant except as provided in Rule
54-II(g), if:
(1) Financial Assistance. The applicant, or a dependent if a claim or defense is
asserted on the dependent’s behalf, receives financial assistance under a program
listed in D.C. Code §§ 15-712(a)(1)(A) or -712(a)(1)(B);
(2) Monthly Income. The applicant’s monthly income does not exceed 200% of the
federal poverty guidelines issued by the United States Department of Health and
Human Services; or
(3) Applicants Receiving Free Legal Representation By Nonprofit Organizations. The
applicant is represented free of charge by a legal services or other nonprofit
organization whose primary purpose is to provide legal services to low-income clients,
or a legal clinic operated by a law school located in the District of Columbia that
provides legal services to low-income clients. For the purposes of this subsection,
representation by a legal services or other nonprofit organization includes
representation by pro bono counsel to whom the litigant has been referred by the
organization. Counsel must include a certification that they are representing the litigant
pro bono on referral from a legal services or other nonprofit organization whose primary
purpose is to provide legal services to low-income clients.
(c) SUBSTANTIAL HARDSHIP WAIVER. If the applicant does not qualify for a waiver
under Rule 54-II(b), the court may approve an application in whole or in part on a finding
that the party is unable to pay costs, fees, or security without substantial hardship to the
applicant or to the applicant’s dependent.
(d) SIGNIFICANT COSTS. In determining whether to waive the payment of costs, fees,
or security, the court must take into account the likelihood that the matter may entail
significant costs to the litigant, such as the costs of e-filing.
(e) MERIT OF UNDERLYING ACTION. In considering an application, the court must not
consider the merit of the underlying action.
(f) DISMISSING ACTIONS; ENJOINING REPEAT FILERS OF FRIVOLOUS MATTERS.
Nothing in this rule should be construed to limit the authority of courts to dismiss actions
or to enjoin repeat filers of frivolous matters from filing future cases without prior
approval of the court.
(g) REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
(1) In General. The court may require additional evidence in support of the request to
waive payment of costs, fees, or security accruing during any action if:
(A) an application is submitted pursuant to Rule 54-II(c);
(B) there is good cause to believe the information submitted by the litigant in support
of the application is inaccurate or misleading; or
(C) the applicant has undergone a change in circumstances bearing on the merits of
the application.
(2) Incomplete Application. An incomplete application will be returned to the applicant
with notice to the applicant as to which information is missing. The applicant may
resubmit a complete application without prejudice.
(h) TIMING. An application may be submitted at any point in the proceedings.
(1) Within 5 calendar days after receiving a completed application, the court must
decide whether to approve the waiver, except that an application presented in open
court must be decided immediately.
(2) If, within 5 calendar days after receiving a completed application, the court has not
ruled on the application, the application will be deemed approved.
(3) The deadlines in Rule 54-II(h) do not apply where the court requires additional
information under Rule 54-II(g).
(i) SERVICE OF COMPLAINT; SERVICE ON MINOR OR INCOMPETENT PERSON;
SERVICE OF WITNESS SUBPOENA; WITNESS FEES. Where an application to
proceed without payment of costs, fees, or security is approved, the following provisions
apply:
(1) Service of Complaint. The clerk must attempt service of the complaint in a manner
prescribed by the court’s rules for all persons who have been granted full waivers of
payment of fees and costs or security and, where partial waivers of the payment of fees
and costs or security have been granted, as directed by the court.
(2) Service on Minor or Incompetent Person. Where the defendant is a minor or
incompetent person within the meaning of D.C. Code §§ 13-332 and -333 (2012 Repl.),
the court may, on motion, appoint a person to serve the materials listed in Rule 4(c)(1)
by the methods described in Rule 4(g).
(3) Service of Witness Subpoena; Witness Fees. On motion, the court may in its
discretion appoint a person to serve witness subpoenas. Witnesses will be subpoenaed
without prepayment of witness fees, and the same remedies will be available as are
provided for by law in other cases.
(4) Date and Manner of Service. The clerk must note the date and manner of service
on the docket.
(j) RULING IN WRITING OR ON THE RECORD.
(1) Denial. If the court denies the application in whole or in part, the court must state
its reason(s) for denial in writing or in court with the applicant present.
(2) Hearing. An applicant who is denied a waiver in whole or in part may request an ex
parte hearing within 14 days to present additional evidence that the applicant is unable
to proceed without substantial hardship to the applicant or the applicant’s dependent. A
hearing under this rule must be held no later than 14 days after the court receives the
hearing request.
(k) MOTION FOR FREE TRANSCRIPTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. An applicant who
has received a waiver of the payment of costs, fees, or security may file a motion
requesting that free transcripts or other documents be prepared and explaining the
basis for the motion. The court must grant the motion for free transcripts or other
documents unless the request is frivolous. In making this determination, the court must
resolve doubt about the frivolousness of the request in favor of the applicant. The court
may order that only those portions of the transcripts or other documents necessary to
resolution of the suit, action, proceeding, or appeal be provided.
(l) CONFIDENTIALITY.
(1) In general. Notwithstanding Rule 5-III and Rule 5.2, the court must keep an
application and any financial information submitted by the applicant pursuant to this rule
confidential, except to the court, the litigant, persons authorized by the litigant, or by
court order.
(2) On Motion.
(A) Any person seeking access to an application or financial information provided to
the court by an applicant may file a motion, with notice given to the litigant who filed the
application, supported by a declaration showing good cause for why the confidential
information should be released to the movant.
(B) Any person granted access to an application or financial information under Rule
54-II(l)(2)(A) must not reveal any information contained in the application or financial
information, except as otherwise authorized by law or court order.
(3) Decision not confidential. The court’s decision on an application for a waiver is not
confidential.
(m) FILING FEE.
(1) In general. No fee will be assessed for filing an Application to Waive Court Costs
and Fees.
(2) Additional information. No fee will be assessed for filing any additional information
relating to an application, including information requested under Rule 54-II(c), (g) or
(j)(2), unless the court has previously considered and denied an application by the
applicant in the same suit, action, or proceeding.
(3) Simultaneous filings. No fee will be assessed for filing any motions or other
documents simultaneously with an application, unless and until the court denies the
application.
(4) Dismissal. If an application is denied in whole, the clerk will dismiss a case without
prejudice or reject a filing, or both, unless the applicable filing fee is paid within 14 days
of the denial.
History
COMMENT TO 2023 AMENDMENTS This rule has been substantially amended and reorganized to implement the Expanding Fee Waivers for Low-Income Litigants Amendment Act of 2022, D.C. Law 24-246, 69 D.C. Reg. 14603 (February 23, 2023), D.C. Code § 15-712. Among other things, the amendments significantly expand the circumstances under which litigants may qualify for an automatic fee waiver under D.C. Code § 15-712(a)(1). The qualifying health care benefits formerly listed in section (c) have been included in the list of qualifying financial assistance programs cited in subsection (b)(1). Amended section (h) includes new statutory deadlines for deciding fee waiver applications. Subsection (i)(1) has been amended, and new subsection (i)(4) has been added, consistent with the new service provisions in D.C. Code § 15-712(f). New subsection (j)(2) implements a new statutory option for applicants to request a hearing if denied a fee waiver. Section (k) has been amended to permit those approved for a fee waiver to request other documents, in addition to free transcripts, as necessary to resolve Superior Court proceedings, as well as appeals. Section (l) is a new provision implementing new confidentiality requirements in D.C. Code § 15-712(d). Section (m) is also a new provision implementing filing fee limitations in D.C. Code § 15-712(e). Finally, minor amendments have been made to other sections to align with the new language of D.C. Code § 15-712. To the extent D.C. Code § 15-712 includes procedural rules, the Court has adopted them pursuant to its exclusive rulemaking authority under D.C. Code § 11-946. See Woodroof v. Cunningham, 147 A.3d 777 (D.C. 2016). COMMENT TO 2019 AMENDMENTS Section (b) was amended to permit the clerk to grant applications when the applicant receives Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, General Assistance for Children, Program on Work, Employment, and Responsibility, or Supplemental Security Income. COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS Section (i) has been amended to clarify and limit the types of service that the court is required to undertake on behalf of in forma pauperis litigants. Generally, the court will attempt service of the complaint and related materials by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or by first-class mail with notice and acknowledgment. By motion, the court may appoint a process server to serve witness subpoenas or to serve a complaint and related materials on an incompetent or minor defendant as required by statute. By limiting the types of service and reducing corresponding costs, the court also helps to limit the in forma pauperis litigant’s potential liability where “[c]osts may be assessed against a party proceeding in forma pauperis at the conclusion of an unsuccessful suit.” Robinson v. Howard University, 455 A.2d 1363, 1367 (D.C. 1983). Additionally, these amendments address a concern first raised in Atherton v. Brooks, 728 A.2d 1195 (D.C. 1999), in which the District of Columbia Court of Appeals opined that the language in Rule 54-II related to the waiver of prepayment of witness fees could be interpreted as imposing a corresponding obligation on the trial court to serve witness subpoenas—“an administrative burden” that might not have been considered when the rule was adopted. COMMENT D.C. Code § 15-712 governs in forma pauperis applications. There is no Federal Rule of Civil Procedure addressing such applications, but 28 U.S.C. § 1915 does. The District of Columbia statute, unlike the federal statute, does not provide the court with discretion to deny an application for in forma pauperis based upon the merit of the underlying action. Compare D.C. Code § 15-712 with 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2); see In re Turkowski, 741 A.2d 406, 407 (D.C. 1999) (per curiam) (“the court must grant the request for in forma pauperis status if a proper application is made, and, having done so, thereafter treat the case as any other, including, of course, any appropriate dispositive actions”); accord Lewis v. Fulwood, 569 A.2d 594, 595 (D.C. 1990) (per curiam). The Rule requires applicants seeking in forma pauperis status to submit their request utilizing Form 106A (Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Costs, Fees or Security), which includes citations to pertinent statutes and case law. Subsection (k) sets forth the standards for ruling upon a motion for free transcripts. See, e.g., P.F. v. N.C., 953 A.2d 1107, 1119 (D.C. 2008) (noting that an appellant proceeding in forma pauperis is entitled to a free transcript “if the trial judge... certifies that the appeal is not frivolous” and that “[d]oubts about [the] substantiality of the questions on appeal and the need for a transcript to explore them should be resolved in favor of the petitioner”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); Hancock v. Mut. of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984), as discussed in P.F., 953 A.2d at 1119.
Provenance
- Source
- dccourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
3fb634a6df1e84f66d410d79de6febfbb57453fbc178afd1fcef912d876c90f5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.