Bindinglaw

DC · rules

D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 40-II

Designation and Assignment of Cases to Civil I Calendars

activein force · 2017-05-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) IN GENERAL. All cases involving claims for relief based on exposure to asbestos or

asbestos products must be designated to a Civil I calendar. The Presiding Judge of the

Civil Division may designate any other case to a Civil I calendar.

(b) ON RECOMMENDATION. On motion of a party or sua sponte, a judge assigned to

a case may recommend to the Presiding Judge that the case be designated to a Civil I

calendar.

(c) FACTORS CONSIDERED. In designating a case to a Civil I calendar, the Presiding

Judge may consider the following:

(1) the estimated length of trial;

(2) the number of witnesses that may appear;

(3) the number of exhibits that may be introduced;

(4) the nature of the factual and legal issues involved;

(5) the extent to which discovery may require supervision by the court;

(6) the number of motions that may be filed in the case; or

(7) any other relevant factors.

(d) DISTRIBUTION OF CIVIL I CASES. The Presiding Judge must assign cases

designated to a Civil I calendar on a rotational basis unless doing so would have an

adverse impact on the efficient resolution of a case.

(e) ASSIGNMENT TO JUDGE. All proceedings in a case after its assignment to a Civil I

calendar must be scheduled and conducted by the judge to whom the case is assigned,

except as otherwise provided in these rules. When a judge’s assignment to a Civil I

calendar is concluded, the Chief Judge or the Presiding Judge must designate the judge

or judges to whom the cases on the calendar of the former Civil I judge will be

reassigned.

(f) PROCEDURE. After a case has been assigned to a Civil I calendar, the judge’s

name and, when known, the calendar number must appear below the case number on

every pleading and other paper filed in the case. Pleadings and other papers in cases

designated to a Civil I calendar must be filed in accordance with Rule 5(d).

History

COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS Stylistic changes were made to this rule to conform with the 2007 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Provenance

Source
dccourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
e8ff1e8b275113d714ad4e46f8c576365257c2dfa10447ba83928286525d135c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.