DC · rules
D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 104
Avoidance and Resolution of Conflicts in Engagements of Counsel
Among the Courts in the District of Columbia
The following provisions, which implement the “Procedures for Avoiding and Resolving
Conflicts in Engagements of Counsel to Appear Before the Courts in the District of
Columbia” dated April 18, 1973, adopted by and applicable to the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, and the Superior Court
of the District of Columbia, shall apply to matters scheduled in this Court:
(a) Priority to Be Accorded Appellate Courts. Trial proceedings in this court will yield,
and if under way will be held in abeyance, during argument by trial counsel in an
appellate court.
(b) Priorities in Trial Courts. Actual trials of civil or criminal cases in this Court or in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia will be accorded priority over any nontrial
matters in either Court. For the purpose of this Rule, a hearing on a preliminary
injunction shall be regarded as a trial. A judge shall set a date for trial only after
ascertaining that trial counsel have no conflicting trial or appellate engagement in any
court within the District of Columbia. If, despite the foregoing and the obligations
imposed on counsel by section (c) of this Rule counsel should have more than one trial
set on 1 day, the following priorities will be recognized:
(1) That case which is first set to commence trial on a specific day will receive priority
over cases which are later set to commence trial on that day. A continued case shall be
treated as set as of the last setting date.
(2) Any trial in progress, including a trial in progress from day to day, shall take
precedence over trial or nontrial engagements of counsel which are set for times during
which the trial is still in progress.
(3) Nontrial matters in a trial court will yield to trials in any court.
(4) If a scheduled trial conflicts with a previously set nontrial matter and, because of
the urgency or complexity of the nontrial matter or the number of persons involved, it
would be difficult to reschedule the nontrial matter, counsel shall immediately advise the
court in which or the judge before whom the conflicting trial is scheduled. The court or
the judge will be receptive to counsel's application for a change of the trial date or an
adjustment of the hours of trial, but shall retain discretion to grant or deny such an
application.
(5) The judges of this court, insofar as practical, will attempt to adjust their schedules
to enable an attorney to attend to brief nontrial matters such as pleas, sentences, or
status and pretrial conferences pending in another court. It is recognized that
emergency situations will arise and that certain types of cases may require special
consideration. The judges of this court will attempt to accommodate these situations by
recognizing the need to depart, on occasion, from rigid scheduling rules when such
situations are brought to their attention by counsel.
(c) Responsibilities of Counsel. It is the professional responsibility of attorneys to avoid
the setting of conflicting engagements in the courts, to inform the courts of expected
difficulties or conflicts which may arise, and to achieve the resolution of such conflicts or
problems at the earliest possible time. The following particular obligations are imposed
upon counsel:
(1) Attorneys are expected to carry with them at all times they are in court a calendar
of their future court appearances.
(2) Attorneys shall appear personally before the judge when a case is being set, reset,
or continued except as otherwise specified below. They shall in every case inform the
court fully as to any matters which may conflict with a setting, resetting, or continued
date being considered by the court. Counsel shall not schedule engagements which
they cannot reasonably expect to attend at the time scheduled. They shall observe such
limitations on the number of matters they schedule as are imposed herein, or are
imposed by the individual courts of this jurisdiction, or which arise by reason of their
professional obligations to their clients. The sole exception to the requirement that
counsel appear personally before the judge when a case is being reset or continued
arises when counsel is physically unable to be present. In such event counsel should
leave 3 open dates with the judge in question, and the trial may be reset in counsel's
absence. It shall, however, be the attorney's duty to appear personally as soon as
possible before the judge who reset the case to confirm the reset date.
(3) Attorneys are obliged to take action immediately upon becoming aware of any
conflict and specifically to call the conflicting engagements to the attention of the judge
being asked to yield, and to pursue the matter until the conflict is resolved. Such matters
may be presented to the judge in open court as a preliminary matter, with advance
notice to other counsel.
(4) If counsel cannot avoid being unexpectedly late for or absent from any scheduled
appearance before any judge, they shall in advance of the scheduled appearance
personally inform the judge of that fact, the reason therefor, and the nature and duration
of the conflicting engagements.
(5) If an attorney has a felony case set for trial in any court on a given day, the
attorney shall not schedule any other case for trial on that day or for any day thereafter
during which that felony trial may reasonably be expected to continue. If an attorney has
a misdemeanor case set for jury trial on a given date, the attorney shall not schedule
more than 1 other misdemeanor case for trial on that day. These restrictions do not
apply to cases as to which an attorney is certain there will be a nontrial disposition.
(6) This Court will take appropriate disciplinary action when an attorney fails to
conduct himself or herself in accordance with the requirements and obligations imposed
by this Rule.
Provenance
- Source
- dccourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
995c7b3677e9b075872f84ca91b92d5e54fa2d8bb84481f7acbfa55989333715
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.