DC · rules
D.C. Super. Ct. 23-110 R. 7
Expansion of Record
(a) Direction for expansion. If the motion is dismissed summarily, the judge may direct
that the record be expanded by the parties by the inclusion of additional materials
relevant to the determination of the merits of the motion.
(b) Materials to be added. The expanded record may include, without limitation, letters
predating the filing of the motion in the court, documents, exhibits, and answers under
oath, if so directed, to written interrogatories propounded by the judge. Affidavits may
be submitted and considered as a part of the record.
(c) Submission to opposing party. In any case in which an expanded record is directed,
copies of the letters, documents, exhibits, and affidavits proposed to be included shall
be submitted to the party against whom they are to be offered, and he or she shall be
afforded an opportunity to admit or deny their correctness.
(d) Authentication. The Court may require the authentication of any material under
subdivision (b) or (c).
Provenance
- Source
- dccourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
fdd722160a1a2dd1c70b708f0e06884661f7b584a18e5c9405da433381427bd8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.