Bindinglaw

CT · rules

Conn. Practice Book Form 209

Defendant’s Supplemental Requests for Production— Workers’ Compensation Benefits—No Intervening Plaintiff

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

The Defendant(s) hereby request(s) that the Plaintiff provide counsel for the Defendant(s) with

copies of the documents described in the following requests for production, or afford counsel for said

Defendant(s) the opportunity or, where requested, sufficient written authorization, to inspect, copy,

photograph or otherwise reproduce said documents. The production of such documents, copies or

written authorizations shall take place at the offices of _____________ not later than sixty (60) days

after the service of the Requests for Production.

In answering these production requests, the Plaintiff(s) are required to provide all information within

their possession, custody or control. If any production request cannot be answered in full, answer to

the extent possible.

(1) Produce a copy of the First Report of Injury (Form FRI), Notice of Claim for Compensation (Form

30C), Notice of Intention to Reduce or Discontinue Benefits (Form 36), and Notice to Administrative

Law Judge and Employee of Intention to Contest Employee’s Right to Compensation Benefits (Form 43).

(2) Produce a copy of all of the approved voluntary agreements, approved stipulations to date, approved

full and final stipulations, findings and awards, and findings and denials that relate to one or more of the

claims referenced in your answer to Interrogatory #2 on Form 208.

(3) Produce a copy of all reports of medical exams requested by the administrative law judge,

respondent and/or employer that were prepared concerning any of the claims referenced in your answer

to Interrogatory #2 on Form 208.

(4) If you are unable to specify the amount of medical benefits, loss of income benefits, and specific

award benefits paid on your behalf, provide an authorization for the same.

COMMENT:

These supplemental requests for production are specifically directed at eliciting information about any workers’ compensation

claims, benefits and agreements. Unless the compensation carrier is a party to the action, it can be difficult to obtain this

information. Often the Plaintiff’s lawyers do not represent the client in the workers’ compensation case, and although this infor -

mation is available in the workers’ compensation file, providing these records to lawyers not involved in the compensation case

could be time-consuming for the workers’ compensation office staff. If compensation benefits were paid, these supplemental

requests for production may be served on the Plaintiff without leave of the court if there is no Intervening Plaintiff in the action.

DEFENDANT,

BY___________________________

CERTIFICATION

I certify that a copy of this document was or will immediately be mailed or delivered electronically or

non-electronically on (date) _________ to all attorneys and self-represented parties of record and that

written consent for electronic delivery was received from all attorneys and exempt from e-filing self-represented parties of record who received or will immediately be receiving electronic delivery.

No. CV- : SUPERIOR COURT

(Plaintiff): JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF

VS. : AT

(Defendant): (Date)

Name and address of each party and attorney that copy was or will immediately be mailed or

delivered to*

*If necessary, attach additional sheet or sheets with the name and address which the copy was or

will immediately be mailed or delivered to.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Signed (Signature of filer ) Print or type name of person signing Date Signed

_________________________________________________________________________________

Mailing address (Number, street, town, state and zip code) or Email address, if applicable Telephone number

HISTORY—2026: In the first sentence of the certification, “exempt from e-filing” was added after “from all attorneys.”

COMMENTARY—2026: The changes to this form are consistent with the changes to the proof of service language in Section

10-14 (a).

History

(Adopted June 14, 2013, to take effect Jan. 1, 2014; amended June 13, 2014, to take effect Jan. 1, 2015; amended June 24, 2016, to take effect Jan. 1, 2017; amended June 23, 2017, to take effect Jan. 1, 2018: ; amended June 12, 2025, to take effect Jan. 1, 2026.)

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
a074dc89ca4c2871c347913f8600b273e9b0a39d815771b3e3a277bbfffc2eda
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.