CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 79a-3
Filing of the Appeal
(a) General provisions
Appeals in child protection matters shall be filed
in accordance with the provisions of Section 63-
3 and all required fees shall be paid in accordance
with Sections 60-7 and 60-8.
(b) Appeal by indigent party
If a trial attorney who has provided representation to an indigent party through the Division of
Public Defender Services declines to pursue an
appeal, that attorney shall ascertain that the indigent party expressly wishes to appeal and obtain
the indigent party’s current address, email
address and telephone number. The trial attorney
shall explain to the indigent party the appellate
review process set forth in this section. The trial
attorney shall within twenty days of the decision or
judgment simultaneously file with the court before
which the matter was heard a motion for an additional twenty or forty day extension of time to
appeal pursuant to Section 79a-2 (a) and (e), a
sworn application signed by the indigent party for
appointment of appellate counsel and a waiver of
fees, costs and expenses, including the cost of an
expedited transcript. If the court finds the indigent
party still to be indigent, the court shall not grant
the application for appointment of appellate counsel but shall first appoint an appellate review attorney for the sole purpose of determining whether
there is any nonfrivolous ground on which to
appeal. The trial attorney shall immediately
request an expedited transcript from an offi -
cial court reporter or court recording monitor in
accordance with Section 79a-5, the cost of
which shall be paid for by the Division of Public
Defender Services.
Any party who is indigent who wishes to appeal
and was not provided with representation by the
Division of Public Defender Services during the
proceeding which resulted in the decision or judgment from which an appeal is being sought shall,
within twenty days of the decision or judgment,
simultaneously file with the court before which the
matter was heard a motion for an additional twenty
or forty day extension of time to appeal pursuant
to Section 79a-2 (a) and (e), a sworn application
signed by the indigent party for appointment of
appellate counsel and a waiver of fees, costs,
and expenses, including the cost of an expedited
transcript. If the court finds the party to be indi -
gent, the court shall not grant the application for
appointment of appellate counsel but shall first
appoint an appellate review attorney for the sole
purpose of determining whether there is any nonfrivolous ground on which to appeal. The indigent
party shall immediately request an expedited
transcript from the official court reporter or court
recording monitor in accordance with Section 79a-
5, the cost of which shall be paid for by the Division
of Public Defender Services.
(c) Review by the Division of Public
Defender Services
(1) An appellate review attorney determining
whether there is a nonfrivolous ground for appeal
shall file a limited ‘‘in addition to’’ appearance with
the trial court for the purpose of that determination.
If the appellate review attorney determines that
there is a nonfrivolous ground on which to appeal,
that attorney shall notify the court, and the application for appellate counsel shall be granted by the
court. The appellate counsel so appointed shall
file a limited ‘‘in addition to’’ appearance with
the trial court for the purpose of prosecuting the
appeal and shall file the appeal in accordance
with Section 63-3.
(2) In a child protection proceeding that has not
resulted in the termination of parental rights, if the
appellate review attorney determines that there
is no nonfrivolous ground on which to appeal, that
attorney shall promptly make this determination
known to the indigent party, the judicial authority
and the Division of Public Defender Services. The
reviewing attorney shall inform the indigent party,
by letter, of his or her determination and of the
balance of the time remaining to file an appeal as
a self-represented party or to secure counsel, who
may file an appearance to represent the indi -
gent party on appeal at the indigent party’s own
expense. A copy of the letter shall be filed with
the clerk for juvenile matters forthwith.
(3) In a termination of parental rights proceeding, if the appellate review attorney determines
that there is no nonfrivolous ground on which to
appeal, that attorney immediately shall file, under-seal, a motion for in-court review, which shall indicate that the appellate review attorney has
thoroughly reviewed the record for potential errors
and set forth the least meritless grounds that might
arguably support an appeal and the factual and
legal bases for the conclusion that an appeal
would be frivolous. Simultaneous with the filing of
the motion for in-court review, the appellate review
attorney shall provide a copy of such motion to
the indigent party seeking to appeal and shall
serve counsel of record and the Division of Public
Defender Services with a written notice that a
motion for an in-court review by the appellate
review attorney has been filed, but shall not serve
counsel of record or the Division of Public
Defender Services with a copy of the motion or
any supporting documentation. The clerk for
juvenile matters shall schedule a hearing on the
motion for in-court review with the presiding judge
or other judge designated to hear the motion
within ten days of the date of its filing.
(4) Unless the presiding judge was also the trial
judge or is unavailable, the presiding judge shall
conduct a nonevidentiary hearing to fully examine
the motion for an in-court review and any argument or response by the indigent party, together
with any relevant portions of the record. The presiding judge shall afford the indigent party an adequate opportunity to bring to the court’s attention
what he or she believes are appealable issues.
In his or her discretion, such judge may require
briefing. The hearing shall be closed except that
the appellate review attorney and the indigent
party shall attend. If the indigent party cannot
attend the hearing for good cause shown, he or
she may file, under seal, a written response to
the motion for an in-court review prior to the date
of the hearing. Absent compelling circumstances,
the hearing shall not be continued if the indigent
party does not appear.
(A) If, after the in-court review, the presiding
judge independently concludes that any appeal
would be frivolous, such judge, within fourteen
days of the date of the hearing, shall issue a decision, either written or oral, denying the indigent
party’s application for appellate counsel and setting forth the basis for his or her finding that an
appeal would be frivolous. Any written or tran -
scribed oral decision of the presiding judge shall
be filed under seal. The presiding judge also shall
order the appellate review attorney to inform the
indigent party, by letter, of the decision and to
provide a copy of the decision to the indigent party.
The appellate review attorney shall also advise
the indigent party of the balance of the time
remaining to file a motion for review and/or an
appeal as a self-represented party or to secure
counsel who may file an appearance to represent
the indigent party for purposes of filing a motion
for review and/or an appeal at the indigent party’s
own expense. A copy of the letter shall be filed
with the clerk for juvenile matters forthwith. An
indigent party may seek review of a denial of an
application for appointment of appellate counsel
on the basis of a finding by the presiding judge
that any appeal would be frivolous solely by filing,
under seal, a motion for review pursuant to Section 79a-2 (d). The Appellate Court shall expeditiously consider any such motion for review.
(B) If, after the in-court review, the presiding
judge concludes that the indigent party’s appeal
is not frivolous, such judge shall grant the application for appointment of appellate counsel.
(5) Any presiding judge who also was the trial
judge or is unavailable shall refer a motion for in-court review filed by an appellate review attorney
to the chief administrative judge for juvenile mat -
ters for assignment to another judicial authority.
If such presiding judge is also the chief administrative judge for juvenile matters, then the motion for
in-court review shall be referred by the presiding
judge to the administrative judge in the judicial
district where the juvenile court hearing the motion
for in-court review is located for assignment to
another judicial authority.
(d) Duties of clerk for juvenile matters for
cases on appeal
The appellate clerk shall send notice to the
clerk for juvenile matters and to the clerk of any
trial court to which the matter was transferred that
an appeal has been filed. Upon receipt of such
notice, the clerk for juvenile matters shall send a
copy of the appeal form and the case information
form to the Commissioner of Children and Fami -
lies, to the petitioner upon whose application the
proceedings in the Superior Court were instituted,
unless such party is the appellant, to any person
or agency having custody of any child who is a
subject of the proceeding, to the Division of Public Defender Services, and to all other interested
persons; and if the addresses of any such persons
do not appear of record, the clerk for juvenile
matters shall call the matter to the attention of a
judge of the Superior Court, who shall make such
an order of notice as such judge deems advisable.
History
(Adopted Nov. 17, 2011, to take effect Feb. 1, 2012; amended Sept. 16, 2015, to take effect Jan. 1, 2016; amended July 23, 2020, to take effect Aug. 4, 2020; amended July 19, 2022, to take effect Jan. 1, 2023.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
96df8ae5980a3c82fb5b152451c079d10627e328ca0b920a9d438bcf1600c9b3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.