CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 72-1
Writs of Error; In General
(a) Writs of error for errors in matters of law
only may be brought from a final judgment of the
Superior Court to the Appellate Court in the following cases: (1) a decision binding on an aggrieved
nonparty; (2) a summary decision of criminal contempt; (3) a denial of transfer of a small claims
action to the regular docket; and (4) as otherwise
necessary or appropriate in aid of its jurisdiction
and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.
(b) No writ of error may be brought in any civil
or criminal proceeding for the correction of
any error where (1) the error might have been
reviewed by process of appeal, or by way of certification, or (2) the parties, by failure timely to seek
a transfer or otherwise, have consented to have
the case determined by a court or tribunal from
whose judgment there is no right of appeal or
opportunity for certification.
History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 4143A.) (Amended Nov. 19, 2003, to take effect Jan. 1, 2004; amended July 23, 2019, to take effect Jan. 1, 2020; amended July 19, 2022, to take effect Jan. 1, 2023; amended July 15, 2025, to take effect Jan. 1, 2026.) HISTORY—2026: What had been subsection (c) concern- ing the certificate of interested entities or individuals was deleted. COMMENTARY—2026: The purpose of this amendment is to provide that parties are required to file a certificate of interested entities or individuals only when the reviewing court orders the parties to file the certificate when necessary.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
0ecf43c86aa404f02efa2e05403e67f5dc52f1cebb4b65df6491da11a34bf596
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.