CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 70-7
Appellate Court Consideration En Banc and Reargument En Banc
(a) Before a case is assigned for oral argument,
the chief judge may order, on the motion of a party
or sua sponte, that a case be heard en banc.
(b) After argument but before decision, the
entire court may order that the case be considered
en banc with or without further oral argument or
with or without supplemental briefs. The judges
who did not hear oral argument shall have avail -
able to them the electronic recording or a transcript of the oral argument before participating in
the decision.
(c) After decision, the entire court may order,
on the motion of a party pursuant to Section 71-5
or sua sponte, that reargument be heard en banc.
History
(Amended July 21, 1999, to take effect Jan. 1, 2000; amended June 2, 2010, to take effect Jan. 1, 2011.) (P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 4112.) (Amended July 21, 1999, to take effect Jan. 1, 2000; amended June 2, 2010, to take effect Jan. 1, 2011.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
40fd2cefa0b182727fa9149aad51fa124496300c88dfff5ffa3a820c56a4e400
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.