CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 67-6
Statutory (§ 53a-46b) Review of Death Sentences
(a) When a sentence of death has been imposed
upon a defendant, following a conviction of a
capital felony in violation of General Statutes §
53a-54b and the hearing upon imposition of the
death penalty pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-
46a, the briefs of the parties shall include a discussion of the issues set forth in General Statutes §
53a-46b (b), to wit, whether (1) the sentence was
the product of passion, prejudice or any other arbitrary factor; (2) the evidence fails to support the
finding of an aggravating circumstance specified in
subsection (h) of § 53a-46a; and (3) the sentence
is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty
imposed in similar cases, considering both the
circumstances of the crime and the character and
record of the defendant.
(b) For the purpose of reviewing the issue of
disproportionality pursuant to General Statutes §
53a-46b (b), the briefs of the parties shall contain
appendices setting forth the circumstances of the
crimes that are claimed to be similar to that of
which the defendant has been convicted and the
characters and records of the defendants involved
therein so far as these are ascertainable from
the transcripts of those trials and hearings on the
imposition of the death penalty or may be judi -
cially noticed. Only those capital felony cases that
have been prosecuted in this state after October
1, 1973, and in which hearings on the imposition
of the death penalty have taken place, whether
or not the death penalty has been imposed, shall
be deemed eligible for consideration as ‘‘similar
cases,’’ unless the court, on application of a party
claiming that the resulting pool of eligible cases
is inadequate for disproportionality review, shall
modify this limitation in a particular case. Any such
application shall identify the additional case or
cases claimed to be similar and set forth, in addition to the circumstances of the crime and the
character and record of the defendant involved, the
provisions of the applicable statutes pertaining to
the imposition of the death penalty with citations
of pertinent decisions interpreting such provisions.
Any such application shall be filed within thirty
days after the delivery date of the transcript ordered
by the appellant, or, if no transcript is required or
the transcript has been received by the appellant
prior to the filing of the appeal, such application
shall be filed within thirty days after filing the appeal.
History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 4064E.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
047073af200be11ddbce0f78f2fef564dc2551c0eb9041ef600cc4d6bd3cdd14
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.