CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 63-8
Ordering and Filing of Transcripts
(a) Within ten days of filing an appeal, the appellant shall, subject to Section 63-6 or Section 63-
7 if applicable, order from an official court reporter
an electronic version of the transcript of the parts
of the proceedings not already on file that the appellant deems necessary for the proper presentation
of the appeal. Such order shall specify the case
name, docket number, judge’s name(s), and hearing date(s), and include a brief, detailed statement
describing the parts of the proceedings of which
a transcript has been ordered. If any other party
deems other parts of the transcript necessary that
were not ordered by the appellant, that party shall,
within twenty days from the filing of the appellant’s
certificate that no transcript is deemed necessary
or transcript order confirmation, similarly order those
parts from an official court reporter. Upon submission of a transcript order, the ordering party will
be provided with an order confirmation that includes
the information required above.
(b) A party shall promptly make satisfactory
arrangements for payment of the costs of the
transcript, pursuant to guidelines established by
the chief court administrator. After those arrangements have been made, an official court reporter
shall provide to the ordering party an acknowledgment of the order, with an estimated date of delivery and estimated number of pages in the
transcript order. The ordering party shall file the
acknowledgment with the appellate clerk with certification pursuant to Section 62-7. If the final portion of the transcript cannot be delivered on or
before the estimated delivery date on the acknowledgment, the official court reporter will, not later
than the next business day, provide to the ordering
party an amended transcript order acknowledgment with a revised estimated delivery date. The
ordering party shall file the amended acknowledgment form immediately with the appellate clerk
with certification pursuant to Section 62-7.
(c) Whenever an electronic transcript is ordered
in accordance with this section, Court Transcript
Services shall have an electronic version of the
transcript produced and deliver it to the ordering
party and the official court reporter. Upon receipt
of all electronic versions of the transcript ordered,
the official court reporter shall deliver to the ordering party a certificate of completion stating the
total number of pages in the entire transcript order
and the date of final delivery of the transcript order.
The official court reporter shall then deliver the
electronic transcripts to the appellate clerk, with
a certification that the electronic version of the
transcript is accurate and a copy of the certificate
of completion.
(d) Upon receipt of the certificate of completion
from the official court reporter, the ordering party
shall file with the appellate clerk the certificate of
completion along with a certification that a copy of
the certificate of completion has been delivered to
all counsel of record in accordance with Section
62-7.
History
(Amended Sept. 16, 2015, to take effect Jan. 1, 2016; amended June 27, 2023, to take effect Jan. 1, 2024.) (P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 4019.) (Amended April 3, 2002, to take effect Nov. 1, 2002; amended July 11, 2012, to take effect Jan. 1, 2013; amended Sept. 16, 2015, to take effect Jan. 1, 2016; amended Oct. 18, 2016, to take effect Jan. 1, 2017; amended June 15, 2021, to take effect Oct. 1, 2021; amended June 27, 2023, to take effect Jan. 1, 2024.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
1c288c1ee895fb5e96784adf0216aa5728ff148118a1187a135cfc73baaac3ec
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.