CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 63-10
Preargument Conferences
The chief justice or the chief judge or a designee
may, in cases deemed appropriate, direct that
conferences of the parties be scheduled in
advance of oral argument. All noncriminal cases
are eligible for preargument conferences except
habeas corpus appeals, appeals involving juve -
nile matters, including child protection appeals as
defined in Section 79a-1, summary process
appeals, foreclosure appeals, and appeals from
the suspension of a motor vehicle license due to
operating under the influence of liquor or drugs. In
order for an eligible case to receive a preargument
conference, the appellant shall file a preargument
conference statement pursuant to Section 63-4
(b) (1) certifying that all parties who are participating in the appeal are interested in attending a
preargment conference.
In any exempt case, all parties appearing and
participating in the appeal may file a joint request
for a preargument conference. In a foreclosure
case, the request for a preargument conference
is sufficient if jointly submitted by the owner of the
equity and the foreclosing party. In any exempt
case, however, the chief justice or the chief judge
or a designee may, if deemed appropriate, order
a preargument conference.
The chief justice may designate a judge of the
Superior Court, a senior judge or a judge trial
referee to preside at a preargument conference.
The scheduling of or attendance at a preargument
conference shall not affect the duty of the parties
to adhere to the times set for the filing of briefs.
Failure of counsel of record to attend a preargument conference may result in the imposition of
sanctions under Section 85-2. Unless other
arrangements have been approved in advance by
the presiding judge, parties shall be present at
the preargument conference site and available for
consultation. When a party against whom a claim
is made is insured, an insurance adjuster for such
insurance company shall be available by telephone at the time of such preargument conference unless the presiding judge, in his or her
discretion, requires the attendance of the adjuster
at the preargument conference. The preargument
conference proceedings shall not be brought to
the attention of the court by the presiding judge
or any of the parties unless the preargument conference results in a final disposition of the appeal.
The following matters may be considered:
(1) Possibility of settlement;
(2) Simplification of issues;
(3) Amendments to the preliminary statement
of issues;
(4) Transfer to the Supreme Court;
(5) Timetable for the filing of briefs;
(6) En banc review; and
(7) Such other matters as the presiding judge
shall consider appropriate.
All matters scheduled for a preargument con -
ference before a judge trial referee are referred to
that official by the chief court administrator pursuant to General Statutes § 52-434a, which vests
judge trial referees with the same powers and
jurisdiction as Superior Court judges and senior
judges, including the power to implement settle -
ments by opening and modifying judgments.
History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 4103.) (Amended July 21, 1999, to take effect Jan. 1, 2000; amended April 6, 2011, to take effect Jan. 1, 2012; amended July 8, 2015, to take effect Jan. 1, 2016; amended Oct. 24, 2018, to take effect Jan. 1, 2019; amended July 31, 2019, to take effect Jan. 1, 2020; amended Jan. 12, 2021, on an interim basis, to take effect Jan. 26, 2021, and amendment adopted June 15, 2021, to take effect Jan. 1, 2022; amended July 19, 2022, to take effect Jan. 1, 2023; amended July 23, 2024, to take effect Oct. 1, 2024.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
308e0e8945ebca7c2efdac650c3d8a640b868db68c55e90e1a64a35200647bcd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.