Bindinglaw

CT · rules

Conn. Practice Book § 42-44

For Prejudice to State

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

Upon motion of the prosecuting authority, the

judicial authority may declare a mistrial if there

occurs during the trial, either inside or outside the

courtroom, misconduct by the defendant, coun -

sel for the defendant, or someone acting at the

request of the defendant or such counsel, which

results in substantial and irreparable prejudice to

the prosecuting authority’s case. If there are two

or more defendants, the mistrial shall not be

declared as to a defendant if neither that defendant, nor counsel for that defendant, nor a person

acting at the request of that defendant or counsel

for that defendant participated in the misconduct,

or if the prosecuting authority’s case is not sub -

stantially and irreparably prejudiced as to that

defendant.

History

(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 888.)

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
1ec96a244b86c7ef1498b2064579a298a2dcceec133a6c60a80fd35bcb56ca81
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.