CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 35a-24
Motions for Posttermination Visitation
(a) Whenever any party seeks an order for posttermination visitation in the context of the termi -
nation of parental rights proceeding, the movant
shall file a motion in accordance with Section
34a-1.
(b) The judicial authority shall hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether such an order
is necessary or appropriate to secure the welfare,
protection, proper care and suitable support of
a child.
(c) Upon motion of any party or upon its own
motion, the judicial authority may consolidate the
hearing on the motion for posttermination visitation with the termination of parental rights trial.
(d) The moving party shall have the burden of
proving that posttermination visits are necessary
or appropriate to secure the welfare, protection,
proper care and suitable support of a child.
(e) In deciding whether to order posttermination
visitation, the judicial authority may consider: the
wishes of the child; the expressed interests of the
birth parent; the frequency and quality of visitation
between the child and birth parent prior to the
termination of the parent’s parental rights; the
strength of the emotional bond between the child
and the birth parent; any interference with present
custodial arrangements; any impact on the adoption prospects for the child; and any other factors
the judicial authority finds relevant and material.
in Lieu of Arrest Warrant
of Trial
History
(Adopted June 9, 2023, to take effect Jan. 1, 2024.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
25e6334010a895f0bf896369e50045b9ff4ef215d458bbea83781cc38ece3510
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.