CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 30a-2
Pretrial Conference
(a) When counsel is requested, or responsibility
is denied, the case may be continued for a pretrial
conference. At the pretrial, the parties may agree
that a substitute information will be filed, or that
certain charges will be nolled or dismissed. If the
child or youth and parent or guardian subsequently execute a written statement of responsibility at the pretrial conference, or the attorney for
the child or youth conveys to the prosecutor an
agreement on the adjudicatory grounds, a predispositional study shall be compiled by the probation
department and the case shall be assigned for a
plea and dispositional hearing.
(b) If a plea agreement has been reached by
the parties which contemplates the entry of a plea
of guilty or nolo contendere in a delinquency case,
and the recommendation of a particular disposi -
tion, the agreement shall be disclosed in open
court at the time the plea is offered. Thereupon
the judicial authority may accept or reject any
agreement, or may defer the decision on accep -
tance or rejection of the agreement until it has
had an opportunity to review the predispositional study.
History
(Amended June 13, 2014, to take effect Jan. 1, 2015; amended June 11, 2021, to take effect Jan. 1, 2022.) (Transferred to Section 26-2.) (Adopted June 24, 2002, to take effect Jan. 1, 2003; amended June 13, 2014, to take effect Jan. 1, 2015; amended June 11, 2021, to take effect Jan. 1, 2022.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
8099f1830bb06837c0ffb7e128788a7fb129bca10449293e91293190ed8ff0d9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.