Bindinglaw

CT · rules

Conn. Practice Book § 27-7

Written Statement of Responsibility

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Where the child or youth and the parent or

guardian affirm that they are ready to go forward

with the investigation, with or without counsel,

and to make a statement concerning the child’s or

youth’s responsibility for the alleged misconduct,

such affirmation must be embodied in a written

statement of responsibility executed by both child

or youth and parent, or guardian, and, in the case

of the child or youth, in the presence of the parent

or guardian.

(b) If a child or youth orally acknowledges

responsibility for the alleged misconduct but refuses

to execute a written statement of responsibility,

such an oral admission shall not be accepted as

the equivalent of an admission, and the case shall

be dealt with in the manner pre- scribed in Section

27-6. If the written statement of responsibility is

executed, the probation officer shall proceed with

the nonjudicial handling of the case.

(c) The age, intelligence and maturity of the child

or youth and the mutuality of interests between parent or guardian and child or youth shall be weighed

in determining their competency to execute such

written statement of responsibility.

History

(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 1025.1 (5), (6).) (Amended June 24, 2002, to take effect Jan. 1, 2003; amended June 30, 2008, to take effect Jan. 1, 2009; amended June 14, 2024, to take effect Jan. 1, 2025.)

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
772bbc16a28a5941b861e33f8965c1581b889273d5eaf356119bd0278198c75b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.