CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 27-7
Written Statement of Responsibility
(a) Where the child or youth and the parent or
guardian affirm that they are ready to go forward
with the investigation, with or without counsel,
and to make a statement concerning the child’s or
youth’s responsibility for the alleged misconduct,
such affirmation must be embodied in a written
statement of responsibility executed by both child
or youth and parent, or guardian, and, in the case
of the child or youth, in the presence of the parent
or guardian.
(b) If a child or youth orally acknowledges
responsibility for the alleged misconduct but refuses
to execute a written statement of responsibility,
such an oral admission shall not be accepted as
the equivalent of an admission, and the case shall
be dealt with in the manner pre- scribed in Section
27-6. If the written statement of responsibility is
executed, the probation officer shall proceed with
the nonjudicial handling of the case.
(c) The age, intelligence and maturity of the child
or youth and the mutuality of interests between parent or guardian and child or youth shall be weighed
in determining their competency to execute such
written statement of responsibility.
History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 1025.1 (5), (6).) (Amended June 24, 2002, to take effect Jan. 1, 2003; amended June 30, 2008, to take effect Jan. 1, 2009; amended June 14, 2024, to take effect Jan. 1, 2025.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
772bbc16a28a5941b861e33f8965c1581b889273d5eaf356119bd0278198c75b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.