CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 24-31
Opening Judgment; Costs
(a) The judicial authority may, upon motion, and
after such notice by mail, or otherwise as it may
order, open any judgment rendered under this
procedure for lack of actual notice to a party, or,
within four months from the date thereof, for any
other cause that the judicial authority may deem
sufficient, and may stay and supersede execu -
tion; except that the judicial authority may, for the
reasons indicated above, open any judgment rendered by default at any time within four months
succeeding the date upon which an execution
was levied. The judicial authority may also order
the repayment of any sum collected under such
judgment and may render judgment and issue
execution therefor. Costs in an amount fixed by the
judicial authority and not exceeding $100 may be
awarded, in the discretion of the judicial authority,
for or against either party to a motion to open the
judgment, and judgment may be rendered and
execution may be issued therefor; and any action
by the judicial authority may be conditioned upon
the payment of such costs or the performance of
any proper condition.
(b) When a judgment has been rendered after a
contested hearing on the merits, a motion to open
shall be scheduled for hearing only upon order of
the judicial authority.
History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 584.) (Amended June 26, 2000, to take effect Jan. 1, 2001; amended June 21, 2010, to take effect Jan. 1, 2011.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
926024f5c48020e50982a13e78f49858b79c5d4ff2495969a6acefb29e64e0cf
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.