Bindinglaw

CT · rules

Conn. Practice Book § 2-80

Restitution by Attorney

activein force · 1999-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

An attorney whose dishonest conduct has

resulted in reimbursement to a claimant shall

make restitution to the fund including interest and

the expense incurred by the fund in processing the

claim. An attorney’s failure to make satisfactory

arrangements for restitution shall be cause for

suspension, disbarment, or denial of an application for reinstatement.

History

(Adopted June 29, 1998, to take effect Jan. 1, 1999.)

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
370debf2b7c725a7eb2737d6eb73add32673614a34b5993fdd48dc4e17e62ba5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Practice Book § 2-80 — Restitution by Attorney · binding.law