CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 2-39
Reciprocal Discipline
(a) Upon being informed that a lawyer admitted
to the Connecticut bar has resigned, been dis -
barred, suspended or otherwise disciplined, or
placed on inactive disability status in another jurisdiction, and that said discipline or inactive disability status has not been stayed, the disciplinary
counsel shall obtain a certified copy of the order
and file it with the Superior Court for the judicial
district wherein the lawyer maintains an office for
the practice of law in this state, except that, if the
lawyer has no such office, the disciplinary counsel
shall file the certified copy of the order from the
other jurisdiction with the Superior Court for the
judicial district of Hartford. No entry fee shall be
required for proceedings hereunder.
(b) Upon receipt of a certified copy of the order,
the court shall forthwith cause to be served upon
the lawyer a copy of the order from the other
jurisdiction and an order directing the lawyer to
file within thirty days of service, with proof of service upon the disciplinary counsel, an answer
admitting or denying the action in the other jurisdiction and setting forth, if any, reasons why commensurate action in this state would be
unwarranted. Such certified copy will constitute
prima facie evidence that the order of the other
jurisdiction entered and that the findings contained therein are true.
(c) Upon the expiration of the thirty day period
the court shall assign the matter for a hearing.
After hearing, the court shall take commensu -
rate action unless it is found that the respondent
has established by clear and convincing evidence
that:
(1) The procedure in the predicate matter was
so lacking in notice or opportunity to be heard as
to constitute a deprivation of due process; or
(2) There was such infirmity of proof establishing the misconduct in the predicate matter as to
give rise to the clear conviction that the court could
not, consistent with its duty, accept as final the
conclusion on that subject; or
(3) The discipline imposed would result in grave
injustice; or
(4) The misconduct established in the predicate
matter warrants substantially different discipline
in this state; or
(5) The reason for the original transfer to inactive disability status no longer exists.
(d) Notwithstanding the above, a reciprocal discipline action need not be filed if the conduct giving
rise to discipline in another jurisdiction has already
been the subject of a formal review by the court
or Statewide Grievance Committee.
History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 28A.) (Amended June 29, 1998, to take effect Sept. 1, 1998; amended August 24, 2001, to take effect Jan. 1, 2002; amended June 24, 2002, to take effect July 1, 2003; May 14, 2003, effective date changed to Oct. 1, 2003; Sept. 30, 2003, effective date changed to Jan. 1, 2004; amended June 11, 2021, to take effect Jan. 1, 2022.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
c561c489a87ce6568619773493bbd2fe5a1c98e433b01ab59195d0b8d807ff83
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.