CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 2-35
Action by Statewide Grievance Committee or Reviewing Committee
(a) Upon receipt of the record from a griev -
ance panel, the Statewide Grievance Committee
may assign the case to a reviewing committee
which shall consist of at least three members of the
Statewide Grievance Committee, at least one
third of whom are not attorneys. The Statewide
Grievance Committee may, in its discretion, reassign the case to a different reviewing committee.
The committee shall regularly rotate membership
on reviewing committees and assignments of
complaints from the various grievance panels. An
attorney who maintains an office for the practice
of law in the same judicial district as the respon -
dent may not sit on the reviewing committee for
that case.
(b) The Statewide Grievance Committee and
the reviewing committee shall have the power to
issue a subpoena to compel any person to appear
before it to testify in relation to any matter deemed
by the Statewide Grievance Committee or the
reviewing committee to be relevant to the com -
plaint and to produce before it for examination
any books or papers which, in its judgment, may
be relevant to such complaint. Any such testimony
shall be on the record.
(c) If the grievance panel determined that probable cause exists that the respondent is guilty of
misconduct, the Statewide Grievance Committee
or the reviewing committee shall hold a hearing
on the complaint. If the grievance panel deter -
mined that probable cause does not exist, but filed
the matter with the Statewide Grievance Committee because the complaint alleges that a crime
has been committed, the Statewide Grievance
Committee or the reviewing committee shall
review the determination of no probable cause,
take evidence if it deems it appropriate and, if it
determines that probable cause does exist, shall
take the following action: (1) if the Statewide
Grievance Committee reviewed the grievance
panel’s determination, it shall hold a hearing concerning the complaint or assign the matter to a
reviewing committee to hold the hearing; or (2) if
a reviewing committee reviewed the grievance
panel’s determination, it shall hold a hearing
concerning the complaint or refer the matter to
the Statewide Grievance Committee which shall
assign it to another reviewing committee to hold
the hearing.
(d) Disciplinary counsel may add additional allegations of misconduct to the grievance panel’s
determination that probable cause exists in the
following circumstances:
(1) Prior to the hearing before the Statewide
Grievance Committee or the reviewing committee, disciplinary counsel may add additional allegations of misconduct arising from the record of
the grievance complaint or its investigation of
the complaint.
(2) Following commencement of the hearing
before the Statewide Grievance Committee or the
reviewing committee, disciplinary counsel may
only add additional allegations of misconduct for
good cause shown and with the consent of the
respondent and the Statewide Grievance Committee or the reviewing committee. Additional allegations of misconduct may not be added after the
hearing has concluded.
(e) If disciplinary counsel determines that additional allegations of misconduct exist, it shall issue
a written notice to the respondent and the State -
wide Grievance Committee, which shall include,
but not be limited to, the following: (1) a description
of the factual allegation or allegations that were
considered in rendering the determination; and
(2) for each such factual allegation, an identification of the specific provision or provisions of the
applicable rules governing attorney conduct considered in rendering the determination.
(f) The respondent shall be entitled to a period
of not less than thirty days before being required
to appear at a hearing to defend against any additional charges of misconduct filed by the disciplinary counsel.
(g) At least two of the same members of a
reviewing committee shall be present at all hear -
ings held by the reviewing committee. If a member
of the reviewing committee is absent for the hearing, the member’s participation in the determination of the matter shall be waived unless the
disciplinary counsel or the respondent object at
the commencement of the hearing. If an objection
is raised, then the absent member of the reviewing
committee shall obtain and review the transcript
of each such hearing and shall participate in the
committee’s determination. All hearings following
a determination of probable cause shall be public
and on the record.
(h) The complainant and respondent shall be
entitled to be present at all hearings and other
proceedings on the complaint at which testimony
is given and to have counsel present. At all hearings, the respondent shall have the right to be
heard in the respondent’s own defense and by
witnesses and counsel. The disciplinary counsel
shall pursue the matter before the Statewide
Grievance Committee or reviewing committee.
The disciplinary counsel and the respondent
shall be entitled to examine or cross-examine witnesses. At the conclusion of the evidentiary phase
of a hearing, the complainant, the disciplinary
counsel and the respondent shall have the opportunity to make a statement, either individually or
through counsel. The Statewide Grievance Committee or reviewing committee may request oral
argument.
(i) Within ninety days of the date the grievance
panel filed its determination with the Statewide
Grievance Committee pursuant to Section 2-32
(i), the reviewing committee shall render a final
written decision dismissing the complaint, imposing sanctions and conditions as authorized by
Section 2-37 or directing the disciplinary counsel
to file a presentment against the respondent in
the Superior Court and file it with the Statewide
Grievance Committee. In a decision of the
reviewing committee directing the disciplinary
counsel to file a presentment against the respondent, the reviewing committee may direct that the
presentment include additional findings of misconduct beyond those set forth in the probable
cause finding and the additional allegations of
misconduct if the findings are supported by the
record. Where there is a final decision dismissing
the complaint, the reviewing committee may give
notice in a written summary order to be followed
by a full written decision. The reviewing commit -
tee’s record in the case shall consist of a copy of
all evidence it received or considered, includ -
ing a transcript of any testimony heard by it, and
its decision. The record shall also be sent to the
Statewide Grievance Committee. The reviewing
committee shall forward a copy of the final decision to the complainant, the disciplinary counsel,
the respondent, and the grievance panel to which
the complaint was forwarded. The decision shall
be a matter of public record if there was a determination by a grievance panel, a reviewing committee or the Statewide Grievance Committee that
there was probable cause that the respondent
was guilty of misconduct. The reviewing committee may file a motion for extension of time not to
exceed thirty days with the Statewide Grievance
Committee which shall grant the motion only upon
a showing of good cause. If the reviewing com -
mittee does not complete its action on a com -
plaint within the time provided in this section, the
Statewide Grievance Committee shall, on motion
of the complainant or the respondent or on its
own motion, inquire into the delay and determine
the appropriate course of action. Enforcement of
the final decision, including the publication of the
notice of a reprimand pursuant to Section 2-54,
shall be stayed for thirty days from the date of
the issuance to the parties of the final decision. In
the event the respondent timely submits to the
Statewide Grievance Committee a request for
review of the final decision of the reviewing committee, such stay shall remain in full force and
effect pursuant to Section 2-38 (b).
(j) If the reviewing committee finds probable
cause to believe the respondent has violated the
criminal law of this state, it shall report its findings
to the chief state’s attorney.
(k) Within thirty days of the issuance to the
parties of the final decision by the reviewing committee, the respondent may submit to the Statewide Grievance Committee a request for review
of the decision. No request for review may be
submitted following a decision approving a pro -
posed disposition filed pursuant to Section 2-82
(b) or (g). Any request for review submitted under
this section must specify the basis for the request
including, but not limited to, a claim or claims that
the reviewing committee’s findings, inferences,
conclusions or decision is or are: (1) in violation
of constitutional provisions, rules of practice or
statutory provisions; (2) in excess of the authority
of the reviewing committee; (3) made upon unlawful procedure; (4) affected by other error of law; (5)
clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative,
and substantial evidence on the whole record;
or (6) arbitrary or capricious or characterized by
abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion and the specific basis for such
claim or claims. For grievance complaints filed on
or after January 1, 2004, the respondent shall
serve a copy of the request for review on disciplinary counsel in accordance with Sections 10-12
through 10-17. Within fourteen days of the
respondent’s submission of a request for review,
disciplinary counsel may file a response. Disciplinary counsel shall serve a copy of the response
on the respondent in accordance with Sections
10-12 through 10-17. No reply to the response
shall be allowed.
(l) If, after its review of a complaint pursuant to
this section that was forwarded to the Statewide
Grievance Committee pursuant to Section 2-32
(i) (2), a reviewing committee agrees with a grievance panel’s determination that probable cause
does not exist that the attorney is guilty of misconduct and there has been no finding of probable
cause by the Statewide Grievance Committee or
a reviewing committee, the reviewing committee
shall have the authority to dismiss the complaint
within the time period set forth in subsection (e)
of this section without review by the Statewide
Grievance Committee. The reviewing committee
shall file its decision dismissing the complaint with
the Statewide Grievance Committee along with
the record of the matter and shall send a copy of
the decision to the complainant, the respondent,
and the grievance panel to which the complaint
was assigned.
(m) If the Statewide Grievance Committee does
not assign a complaint to a reviewing committee,
it shall have 120 days from the date the panel’s
determination was filed with it to render a decision
dismissing the complaint, imposing sanctions and
conditions as authorized by Section 2-37 or directing the disciplinary counsel to file a presentment
against the respondent. In a decision of the Statewide Grievance Committee directing the disciplinary counsel to file a presentment against the
respondent, the Statewide Grievance Committee
may direct that the presentment include additional
findings of misconduct beyond those set forth in
the probable cause finding and the additional allegations of misconduct if the findings are supported
by the record. The decision shall be a matter of
public record. The failure of a reviewing committee
to complete its action on a complaint within the
period of time provided in this section shall not
be cause for dismissal of the complaint. If the
Statewide Grievance Committee finds probable
cause to believe that the respondent has violated
the criminal law of this state, it shall report its
findings to the chief state’s attorney.
History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 27J.) (Amended June 28, 1999, to take effect Jan. 1, 2000; amended June 24, 2002, to take effect July 1, 2003; May 14, 2003, effective date changed to Oct. 1, 2003; Sept. 30, 2003, effective date changed to Jan. 1, 2004; amended June 26, 2006, to take effect Jan. 1, 2007; amended June 29, 2007, to take effect Jan. 1, 2008; amended June 30, 2008, to take effect Jan. 1, 2009; amended June 15, 2012, to take effect Jan. 1, 2013; subsection (g) amended June 11, 2021, to take effect July 13, 2021; amended June 11, 2021, to take effect Jan. 1, 2022.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
9eefa09317edf73c639ef18a7f800bcc9e8472ea5ec350f960b6764c0b4b7c3e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.