CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 2-11
Monitoring Compliance with Conditions of Admission; Removal or Modification of Conditions
(a) If an applicant is admitted to the bar after
signing an agreement with the bar examining
committee under oath affirming acceptance of the
conditions prescribed by the bar examining committee pursuant to Section 2-9 (b) and that he
or she will comply with them, the statewide bar
counsel shall monitor the attorney’s compliance
with those conditions pursuant to regulations
adopted by the Statewide Grievance Committee
governing such monitoring. The attorney so admitted or the statewide bar counsel may make application to the bar examining committee to remove
or modify the conditions previously agreed to by
such attorney as circumstances warrant. The bar
examining committee, or a panel thereof consisting of at least three members appointed by its
chair, shall conduct a hearing on the application,
which shall be on the record, and shall also receive
and consider a report from the statewide bar counsel on the matter. Such hearing may be waived
by the applicant and the statewide bar counsel.
If, upon such application, the bar examining committee modifies such conditions, the attorney shall
sign an agreement with the bar examining committee under oath affirming acceptance of the
modified conditions and that he or she will comply
with them, and the statewide bar counsel shall
monitor the attorney’s compliance with them. The
statewide bar counsel shall be considered a party
for purposes of defending an appeal under Sec -
tion 2-11A. All information relating to conditional
admission of an applicant or attorney shall remain
confidential unless otherwise ordered by the court,
except that a copy of the signed agreement and
information related to compliance with the con -
ditions may be made available upon request to
disciplinary counsel or, with the consent of the
applicant or attorney, to any other agency or person.
(b) Upon the failure of the attorney to comply
with the conditions of admission or the monitoring
requirements adopted by the Statewide Grievance
Committee, the statewide bar counsel shall apply
to the court in the judicial district of Hartford for
an appropriate order. The court, after hearing upon
such application, may take such action as it deems
appropriate. Thereafter, upon application of the
attorney or of the statewide bar counsel and upon
good cause shown, the court may set aside or
modify the order rendered pursuant hereto.
History
(Amended June 30, 2008, to take effect Jan. 1, 2009.) (P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 18A.) (Amended June 29, 1998, to take effect Sept. 1, 1998; amended June 30, 2008, to take effect Jan. 1, 2009; amended June 26, 2006, to take effect Jan. 1, 2021.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
4aa8461973123765d59b4d1f345580a6635d546792934e9419ea0247164fa56d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.