CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 19-8
Report
(a) The report of a committee, attorney trial referee or special assignment probate judge shall
state, in separate and consecutively numbered
paragraphs, the facts found and the conclusions
drawn therefrom. It should not contain statements
of evidence or excerpts from the evidence. The
report should ordinarily state only the ultimate
facts found; but if the committee, attorney trial
referee or special assignment probate judge has
reason to believe that the conclusions as to such
facts from subordinate facts will be questioned, it
may also state the subordinate facts found proven; and any committee, attorney trial referee or
special assignment probate judge having reason
to believe that the rulings will be questioned may
state them with a brief summary of such facts as
are necessary to explain them; and the committee, attorney trial referee or special assignment
probate judge should state such claims as were
made by the parties and which either party requests
be stated.
(b) The committee, attorney trial referee or special assignment probate judge may accompany
the report with a memorandum of decision including such matters as it may deem helpful in the
decision of the case, and, in any case in which
appraisal fees may be awarded by the court, shall
make a finding and recommendation as to such
appraisal fees as it deems reasonable.
History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 434.) (Amended June 28, 1999, to take effect Jan. 1, 2000; amended June 20, 2011, to take effect Jan. 1, 2012.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
5333d5ddbfa967245e9e15cb0cd5d1bf528c11a8b2b45cefc21c7d9409c2d4cf
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.