CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 17-44
Summary Judgments; Scope of Remedy
In any action, including administrative appeals
which are enumerated in Section 14-7 (c), any
party may move for a summary judgment as to
any cause of action or defense as a matter of right
at any time if no scheduling order exists and the
case has not been assigned for trial. If a scheduling order has been entered by the court, either
party may move for summary judgment as to any
cause of action or defense as a matter of right by
the time specified in the scheduling order. If no
scheduling order exists but the case has been
assigned for trial, a party must move for permission of the judicial authority to file a motion for
summary judgment. These rules shall be applicable to counterclaims and cross complaints, so that
any party may move for summary judgment upon
any counterclaim or cross complaint as if it were
an independent action. The pendency of a motion
for summary judgment shall delay trial only at the
discretion of the trial judge.
History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 379.) (Amended June 14, 2013, to take effect Jan. 1, 2014; amended June 23, 2017, to take effect Jan. 1, 2018; amended June 14, 2024, to take effect Jan. 1, 2025.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
182c52582656cb13f64a4a4b0e666cf0b9f95902c82ed6b84660be5315617718
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.