Bindinglaw

CT · rules

Conn. Practice Book § 16-18

Interrogatories to the Jury

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

The judicial authority may submit to the jury written interrogatories for the purpose of explaining or

limiting a general verdict, which shall be answered

and delivered to the clerk as a part of the verdict.

The clerk will take the verdict and then the answers

to the several interrogatories, and thereafter the

clerk will take the judicial authority’s acceptance of

the verdict returned and the questions as answered,

and proceed according to the usual practice. The

judicial authority will not accept a verdict until the

interrogatories which are essential to the verdict

have been answered.

Sec.16-19. Reading of Statement of Amount

in Demand or Statement of Claim; Arguing

Amount Recoverable

In any action seeking damages for injury to the

person, the amount demanded in the complaint

shall not be disclosed to the jury. In the event that

the jury shall return a verdict which exceeds the

amount demanded, the judicial authority shall

reduce the award to, and render judgment in, the

amount demanded. Counsel for any party to the

action may articulate to the jury during closing

argument a lump sum or mathematical formula

as to damages claimed to be recoverable. The

judicial authority shall issue cautionary instructions pursuant to General Statutes § 52-216b.

History

(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 312.) (P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 313.)

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
ffe1d2419cb99fc27695dd70635351d6587073d3bd4db15280cf3f4f9d25ffbf
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Practice Book § 16-18 — Interrogatories to the… · binding.law