CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 16-12
View by Jury of Place or Thing Involved in Case
When the judicial authority is of the opinion that
a viewing by the jury of the place or thing involved
in the case will be helpful to the jury in determining
any material factual issue, it may in its discretion,
at any time before the closing arguments, order
that the jury be conducted to such place or location
of such thing. During the viewing, the jury must
be kept together under the supervision of a proper
officer appointed by the judicial authority. The judicial authority and an official court reporter or court
recording monitor must be present, and, with the
judicial authority’s permission, any other person
may be present. Counsel and self-represented
parties may as a matter of right be present, but
the right may be waived. The purpose of viewing
shall be solely to permit visual observation by the
jury of the place or thing in question and to permit
a brief description of the site or thing being viewed
by the judicial authority or by any witness or wit -
nesses as allowed by the judicial authority. Any
proceedings at the location, including examination
of witnesses, shall be at the discretion of the judicial authority. Neither the parties nor counsel nor
the jurors while viewing the place or thing may
engage in discussion of the significance or the
implications of anything under observation or of
any issue in the case.
(See Sec. 844, P .B. 1978-1997.) (P .B.1998.) (Amended
June 26, 2020, to take effect Jan. 1, 2021.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
de4de38951a5d8ab2b82ad940767a49693057d37f59b3615728e0df946c535ed
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.