CT · rules

Conn. Practice Book § 13-8

Objections to Interrogatories

activein force · 2023-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) The party objecting to any interrogatory

shall: (1) set forth each interrogatory; (2) specifically state the reasons for the objection; and

(3) state whether any responsive information is

being withheld on the basis of the stated objection.

Objections shall be governed by the provisions of

Sections 13-2 through 13-5, signed by the attor -

ney or self-represented party making them, and

filed with the court pursuant to Section 13-7. No

objection may be filed with respect to interrogatories which have been set forth in Forms 201, 202,

203, 208, 210, 212, 213, 214, 218, 220 and/or

221 of the rules of practice for use in connection

with Section 13-6.

(b) To the extent a party withholds responsive

information based on an assertion of a claim of

privilege or work product protection, the party

must file an objection in compliance with the provisions of subsection (a) of this section and comply

with the provisions set forth in subsection (d) of

Section 13-3.

placed on the short calendar list until an affidavit

by either counsel is filed certifying that bona fide

attempts have been made to resolve the differences concerning the subject matter of the objection and that counsel have been unable to reach

an agreement. The affidavit shall set forth the date

of the objection, the name of the party who filed

the objection and the name of the party to whom

the objection was addressed. The affidavit shall

also recite the date, time and place of any conference held to resolve the differences and the

names of all persons participating therein or, if

no conference has been held, the reasons for the

failure to hold such a conference. If any objection

to an interrogatory is overruled, the objecting party

shall answer the interrogatory, and serve the

answer within twenty days after the judicial authority ruling unless otherwise ordered by the judicial authority.

(d) An interrogatory otherwise proper is not

objectionable merely because it involves more

than one fact or relates to the application of law

to facts.

History

(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 225.) (Amended Aug. 24, 2001, to take effect Jan. 1, 2002; amended June 20, 2011, to take effect Jan. 1, 2012; amended June 14, 2013, to take effect Jan. 1, 2014; amended June 24, 2016, to take effect Jan. 1, 2017; amended June 23, 2017, to take effect Jan. 1, 2018; amended June 10, 2022, to take effect Jan. 1, 2023.)

Provenance

Source: jud.ct.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-15
Edition: 2026-09-15
Content hash: 9c106b5b5b39ee80df67d425394fba05c8bf489e8f77166ff2edfab194275c8e

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs