Bindinglaw

CT · rules

Conn. Practice Book § 13-13

Disclosure of Assets in Cases in Which Prejudgment Remedy Sought

activein force · 2012-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) The judicial authority may, on motion, order

any appearing party against whom a prejudgment

remedy has been granted to disclose property

in which the party has an interest or debts owing

to the party sufficient to satisfy a prejudgment

remedy. The existence, location and extent of a

party’s interest in such property or debts shall be

subject to disclosure after hearing on the motion

for disclosure. The form and terms of disclosure

shall be determined by the judicial authority.

(b) A motion to disclose pursuant to this section

may be made by filing it with the application for

a prejudgment remedy or may be made at any

time after the filing of the application.

(c) The judicial authority may order disclosure

at any time prior to final judgment after it has

determined that the party filing the motion for disclosure has, pursuant to either General Statutes

§§ 52-278d, 52-278e or 52-278i, probable cause

sufficient for the issuance of a prejudgment remedy.

(d) Any party, in lieu of disclosing assets pur -

suant to subsection (a), may move the judicial

authority for substitution either of a bond with

surety substantially in compliance with General

Statutes §§ 52-307 and 52-308 or of other sufficient security.

History

(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 230A.) (Amended June 20, 2011, to take effect Jan. 1, 2012.)

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
21dadad8fdde1b71cf70caf1e278772d8fbd51de8e793d37f7c0624fbe132097
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Practice Book § 13-13 — Disclosure of Assets in… · binding.law