CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 13-13
Disclosure of Assets in Cases in Which Prejudgment Remedy Sought
(a) The judicial authority may, on motion, order
any appearing party against whom a prejudgment
remedy has been granted to disclose property
in which the party has an interest or debts owing
to the party sufficient to satisfy a prejudgment
remedy. The existence, location and extent of a
party’s interest in such property or debts shall be
subject to disclosure after hearing on the motion
for disclosure. The form and terms of disclosure
shall be determined by the judicial authority.
(b) A motion to disclose pursuant to this section
may be made by filing it with the application for
a prejudgment remedy or may be made at any
time after the filing of the application.
(c) The judicial authority may order disclosure
at any time prior to final judgment after it has
determined that the party filing the motion for disclosure has, pursuant to either General Statutes
§§ 52-278d, 52-278e or 52-278i, probable cause
sufficient for the issuance of a prejudgment remedy.
(d) Any party, in lieu of disclosing assets pur -
suant to subsection (a), may move the judicial
authority for substitution either of a bond with
surety substantially in compliance with General
Statutes §§ 52-307 and 52-308 or of other sufficient security.
History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 230A.) (Amended June 20, 2011, to take effect Jan. 1, 2012.)
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
21dadad8fdde1b71cf70caf1e278772d8fbd51de8e793d37f7c0624fbe132097
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.