CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 10-35
Request To Revise
Whenever any party desires to obtain (1) a more
complete or particular statement of the allegations
of an adverse party’s pleading, or (2) the deletion
of any unnecessary, repetitious, scandalous,
impertinent, immaterial or otherwise improper
allegations in an adverse party’s pleading, or (3)
separation of causes of action which may be
united in one complaint when they are improperly
combined in one count, or the separation of two
or more grounds of defense improperly combined
in one defense, or (4) an attachment to an adverse
party’s complaint or other pleading any express
agreement alleged as a ground of action or
defense, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10-29, or (5) any other appropriate correction
in an adverse party’s pleading, the party desiring
any such amendment in an adverse party’s pleading may file a timely request to revise that
pleading.
History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 147; amended June 12, 2025, to take effect Jan. 1, 2026.) HISTORY—2026: What is now subdivision (4) was added and what had been subdivision (4) was redesignated as subdi- vision (5). COMMENTARY—2026: The change to this section renum- bers current subdivision (4) as subdivision (5) and adds new subdivi- sion (4) that allows a party to request that any express agreement alleged as a ground of action or defense be attached to the adverse party’s complaint. The most likely reason for such a request would be for the purposes of filing a motion to strike. The provisions of Section 10-29, which generally do not require the plaintiff to attach the written agreement to the original complaint, are not impacted by this change. Section 4-7 will continue to control to the extent there is any personal identifying information in the agreement sought to be attached. If a litigant opposes the requested revision because they claim the agreement sought to be attached contains trade secrets or other confidential information, Section 11-20A would con - trol, and that litigant could move to file under seal or seek to otherwise limit disclosure by redactions, etc., the agreement sought to be attached.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
bcefe563ba222619bbffcd8048953618474aca27a9af2d767b1990b41145cecc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.