CT · rules
Conn. Practice Book § 1-11C
Media Coverage of Criminal Proceedings
(a) Except as authorized by Section 1-11A
regarding media coverage of arraignments, the
broadcasting, televising, recording or photographing by media of criminal proceedings and
trials in the Superior Court shall be allowed except
as hereinafter precluded or limited and subject to
the limitations set forth in Section 1-10B.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (q) of this
section, no broadcasting, televising, recording or
photographing of trials or proceedings involving
sexual offense charges shall be permitted.
(c) As used in this rule, the word ‘‘trial’’ in jury
cases shall mean proceedings taking place after
the jury has been sworn and in nonjury proceedings commencing with the swearing in of the first
witness. ‘‘Criminal proceeding’’ shall mean any
hearing or testimony, or any portion thereof, in
open court and on the record except an arraign -
ment subject to Section 1-11A.
(d) Unless good cause is shown, any media or
pool representative seeking to broadcast, televise, record or photograph a criminal proceeding
or trial shall, at least three days prior to the com -
mencement of the proceeding or trial, send an
email request for media coverage to a person
designated by the chief court administrator to
receive such requests. The designee shall inform
the administrative judge, presiding judge of criminal matters, judicial authority who will hear the
proceeding or who will preside over the trial, clerk,
and the supervising marshal of the request, and
the judicial authority shall allow such coverage
except as otherwise provided.
(e) Any party, attorney, witness or other interested person may object in advance of electronic
coverage of a criminal proceeding or trial if there
exists a substantial reason to believe that such
coverage will undermine the legal rights of a party
or will significantly compromise the safety of a
witness or other person or impact significant privacy concerns. In the event that the media request
camera coverage and, to the extent practicable,
notice that an objection to the electronic coverage
has been filed, the date, time and location of the
hearing on such objection shall be posted on the
Judicial Branch website. Any person, including
the media, whose rights are at issue in considering
whether to allow electronic coverage of the pro -
ceeding or trial, may participate in the hearing
to determine whether to limit or preclude such
coverage. When such objection is filed by any
party, attorney, witness or other interested person, the burden of proving that electronic coverage of the criminal proceeding or trial should be
limited or precluded shall be on the person who
filed the objection.
(f) The judicial authority, in deciding whether to
limit or preclude electronic coverage of a criminal
proceeding or trial, shall consider all rights at issue
and shall limit or preclude such coverage only if
there exists a compelling reason to do so, there
are no reasonable alternatives to such limitation
or preclusion, and such limitation or preclusion is
no broader than necessary to protect the compelling interest at issue.
(g) If the judicial authority has a substantial reason to believe that the electronic coverage of a
criminal proceeding or trial will undermine the
legal rights of a party or will significantly compromise the safety or privacy concerns of a party,
witness or other interested person, and no party,
attorney, witness or other interested person has
objected to such coverage, the judicial authority
shall schedule a hearing to consider limiting or
precluding such coverage. To the extent practicable, notice that the judicial authority is considering
limiting or precluding electronic coverage of a
criminal proceeding or trial, and the date, time
and location of the hearing thereon shall be given
to the parties and others whose interests may be
directly affected by a decision so that they may
participate in the hearing and shall be posted on
the Judicial Branch website.
(h) Objection raised during the course of a criminal proceeding or trial to the photographing, video
or audio recording of specific aspects of the pro -
ceeding or trial, or specific individuals or exhibits
will be heard and decided by the judicial authority,
based on the same standards as set out in subsection (f) of this section used to determine whether
to limit or preclude coverage based on objections
raised before the start of a criminal proceeding
or trial.
(i) The judge presiding over the proceeding or
trial in his or her discretion, upon the judge’s own
motion or at the request of a participant, may
prohibit the broadcasting, televising, recording or
photographing of any participant at the trial. The
judge shall give great weight to requests where
the protection of the identity of a person is desirable in the interests of justice, such as for the
victims of crime, police informants, undercover
agents, relocated witnesses, juveniles and individuals in comparable situations. ‘‘Participant’’ for
the purpose of this section shall mean any party,
lawyer or witness.
(j) The judicial authority shall articulate the reasons for its decision on whether or not to limit or
preclude electronic coverage of a criminal proceeding or trial, and such decision shall be final.
(k) (1) Only one television camera operator,
utilizing one portable mounted television camera,
shall be permitted in the courtroom. The television
camera and operator shall be positioned in such
location in the courtroom as shall be designated
by the trial judge. Microphones, related wiring and
equipment essential for the broadcasting, televising or recording shall be unobtrusive and shall be
located in places designated in advance by the
trial judge. While the trial is in progress, the television camera operator shall operate the television
camera in this designated location only.
(2) Only one still camera photographer shall
be permitted in the courtroom. The still camera
photographer shall be positioned in such location
in the courtroom as shall be designated by the
trial judge. While the trial is in progress, the still
camera photographer shall photograph court proceedings from this designated location only.
(3) Only one audio recorder shall be permitted
in the courtroom for purposes of recording the
proceeding or trial. Microphones, related wiring
and equipment essential for the recording shall
be unobtrusive and shall be located in places designated in advance by the trial judge.
(l) Only still camera, television and audio equipment which does not produce distracting sound
or light shall be employed to cover the proceeding
or trial. The operator of such equipment shall not
employ any artificial lighting device to supplement
the existing light in the courtroom without the
approval of the judge presiding over the proceeding or trial and other appropriate authority.
(m) Except as provided by these rules, broad -
casting, televising, recording and photographing
in areas immediately adjacent to the courtroom
during sessions of court or recesses between sessions shall be prohibited.
(n) The conduct of all attorneys with respect to
trial publicity shall be governed by Rule 3.6 of the
Rules of Professional Conduct.
(o) If there are multiple requests to broadcast,
televise, record or photograph the same criminal
proceeding or trial, the media representatives
making such requests must make pooling arrangements among themselves, unless otherwise
determined by the judicial authority. The judicial
authority shall not mediate any disputes among
the media regarding pooling arrangements.
(p) To evaluate and resolve prospective prob -
lems where broadcasting, televising, recording or
photographing by media of a criminal proceeding
or trial will take place, and to ensure compliance
with these rules during the proceeding or trial, the
judicial authority who will hear the proceeding or
preside over the trial may require the attendance
of attorneys and media personnel at a pretrial conference.
(q) In a homicide case involving sexual assault,
the broadcasting, televising, recording or photo -
graphing by the media of the trial may be permitted
by the judicial authority, provided that the victim’s
family affirmatively consents to such coverage,
that no member of the victim’s family objects to
such coverage, and that the victim’s family have
been notified. As used in this section, ‘‘victim’s
family’’ shall mean a person’s spouse, parent,
grandparent, stepparent, aunt, uncle, niece,
nephew, child, including a natural born child, step-child and adopted child, grandchild, brother, sister, half brother or half sister or parent of a
person’s spouse.
History
(Amended June 20, 2011, to take effect Jan. 1, 2012.) (Adopted June 29, 2007, to take effect Jan. 1, 2008; amended June 20, 2011, to take effect Jan. 1, 2012; amended June 26, 2020, to take effect Jan. 1, 2021; amended June 10, 2022, to take effect Jan. 1, 2023.) COMMENTARY—2021: The changes to this section and to Section 1-10B permit the judicial authority to allow media coverage of a homicide case involving sexual assault, provided that the victim’s family affirmatively consents to such coverage, that no member of the victim’s family objects to such coverage and that the victim’s family has been notified. If any member of the victim’s family objects to such coverage or if the victim’s family cannot be identified or located, the judicial authority should not allow such coverage. As used in this section, ‘‘vic- tim’s family’’ has the same meaning as ‘‘relative’’ in General Statutes § 54-201 (4). TECHNICAL CHANGE: A technical change was made in subsection (h) to update the terminology to align with current technology and practice.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
6845ed4556c1dcdb8aa5500cb8d21516b31c457670acb78c3458eac6acc56181
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.