Conn. Code Jud. Conduct R. 3.14

History

(Effective Jan. 1, 2011.) COMMENT: (1) Educational, civic, religious, fraternal, and charitable organizations often sponsor meetings, seminars, symposia, dinners, awards ceremonies, and similar events. Judges are encouraged to attend educational programs, as both teachers and participants, in law related and academic disciplines, in furtherance of their duty to remain competent in the law. Participation in a variety of other extrajudicial activity is also permitted and encouraged by this Code. (2) Not infrequently, sponsoring organizations invite certain judges to attend seminars or other events on a fee-waived or partial-fee-waived basis and sometimes include reimburse - ment for necessary travel, food, lodging, or other incidental expenses. A judge’s decision whether to accept reimburse- ment of expenses or a waiver or partial waiver of fees or charges in connection with these or other extrajudicial activities must be based on an assessment of all the circumstances. Per diem allowances shall be reasonably related to the actual costs incurred. The judge must undertake a reasonable inquiry to obtain the information necessary to make an informed judg- ment about whether acceptance would be consistent with the requirements of this Code. (3) A judge must assure himself or herself that acceptance of reimbursement or fee waivers would not appear to a reason- able person to undermine the judge’s independence, integrity, or impartiality. The factors that a judge should consider when deciding whether to accept reimbursement or a fee waiver for attendance at a particular activity include: (a) whether the sponsor is an accredited educational institu- tion or bar association rather than a trade association or a for-profit entity; (b) whether the funding comes largely from numerous con- tributors rather than from a single entity and is earmarked for programs with specific content; (c) whether the content is related or unrelated to the subject matter of litigation pending or impending before the judge or to matters that are likely to come before the judge; (d) whether the activity is primarily educational rather than recreational and whether the costs of the event are reasonable and comparable to those associated with similar events spon- sored by the judiciary, bar associations, or similar groups; (e) whether information concerning the activity and its fund- ing sources is available upon inquiry; (f) whether the sponsor or source of funding is generally associated with particular parties or interests currently appearing or likely to appear in the judge’s court, thus possibly requiring disqualification of the judge under Rule 2.11; (g) whether differing viewpoints are presented; and (h) whether a broad range of judicial and nonjudicial partici- pants are invited, whether a large number of participants are invited, and whether the program is designed specifically for judges.