CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 9.6-3
Interruption of Computer Services -- § 53a-251 (d) and §§ 53a-252 through 53a-256
Note: The various types of computer crime are defined in § 53a-251. The degree of the
offense is determined by the value of the property damaged or services stolen or interfered
with. See § 53a-252 (first degree: exceeds $10,000), § 53a-253 (second degree: exceeds
$5,000), § 53a-254 (third degree: exceeds $1,000), § 53a-255 (fourth degree: exceeds $500),
and § 53a-256 (fifth degree: does not exceed $500). In addition, the value of the property or
services is irrelevant if the defendant recklessly created a risk of serious physical injury, in
which case it is third degree (e.g., interfering with the computer system of a medical or
emergency organization).
The defendant is charged [in count__] with interruption of computer services in the (first /
second / third/ fourth / fifth) degree. The statute defining this crime reads in pertinent part as
follows:
a person is guilty of the computer crime of interruption of computer services when
(he/she), without authorization, intentionally or recklessly disrupts or degrades or
causes the disruption or degradation of computer services or denies or causes the
denial of computer services to an authorized user of a computer system.
[<Insert if appropriate:> For the purposes of this statute, “person” means a natural person,
corporation, limited liability company, trust, partnership, incorporated or unincorporated
association and any other legal or governmental entity, including any state or municipal entity or
public official. <Describe the status of the defendant as a person.>]
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Interfered with the delivery of computer services
The first element is that the defendant <insert as appropriate:>
• (disrupted / degraded / caused the disruption of / caused the degradation of) computer
services. “Computer services” includes, but is not limited to, computer access, data
processing and data storage.
• (denied / caused to be denied) computer services to an authorized user of the computer
system. “Computer system” means a computer, its software, related equipment,
communications facilities, if any, and includes computer networks. “Computer” means a
programmable, electronic device capable of accepting and processing data. “Computer
network” means (A) a set of related devices connected to a computer by communications
facilities, or (B) a complex of two or more computers, including related devices,
connected by communications facilities.
<Describe specific allegations.>
Element 2 - Without authorization
The second element is that the defendant was not authorized to <insert specific allegations>.
Element 3 - Intent / Recklessness
The third element is that the defendant acted <insert as appropriate:>
• with the specific intent to <insert allegations>. A person acts “intentionally” with
respect to a result when (his/her) conscious objective is to cause such result. <See Intent:
Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>
• recklessly. A person acts “recklessly” with respect to a result or circumstances when
(he/she) is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that
such result will occur or that such circumstances exist. <See Recklessness, Instruction
2.3-4.>
Element 4 - Value of property or services / Risk of serious physical injury
[<If the state is alleging a dollar amount of damages:>
The fourth element is that the damage to or the value of the property or computer services
<insert according to degree charged:>
• First degree: exceeds $10,000.
• Second degree: exceeds $5,000.
• Third degree: exceeds $1,000.
• Fourth degree: exceeds $500.
• Fifth degree: is $500 or less.
The value of property or computer services is either 1) the market value of the property or
computer services at the time of the crime; or 2) if the property or computer services are
unrecoverable, damaged or destroyed as a result of the crime, the cost of reproducing or
replacing the property or computer services at the time of the crime. When the value of the
property or computer services or damage to the property or the services cannot be satisfactorily
ascertained, the value shall be deemed to be two hundred fifty dollars. The value of private
personal data shall be deemed to be one thousand five hundred dollars.
[<If there are multiple items and their values can be aggregated:> In making this determination,
you may add or aggregate the value of the property involved. You can only aggregate amounts if
the thefts were committed pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct,
whether from the same or several persons.2]
[<If the state is alleging reckless conduct:>
The fourth element is that the defendant engaged in conduct that created a risk of serious
physical injury to another person. A person acts “recklessly” with respect to a result or
circumstances when (he/she) is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and
unjustifiable risk that such result will occur or that such circumstances exist. <See Recklessness,
Instruction 2.3-4.>
“Serious physical injury” is something more serious than mere physical injury, which is defined
as “impairment of physical condition or pain.” It is more than a minor or superficial injury. It is
defined by statute as “physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes
serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function
of any bodily organ.”]
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant (disrupted
computer services / degraded computer service / denied computer services to an authorized user),
2) (he/she) was not authorized to do so, 3) (he/she) acted (intentionally / recklessly) and 4)
<insert the value of the damages or the allegations of recklessness>.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of interruption of computer services in the (first / second / third/ fourth / fifth)
degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that
the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find
the defendant not guilty.
1 General Statutes § 53a-259.
2 General Statutes § 53a-258.
3 Reckless conduct that creates a risk of serious physical injury to another person is computer
crime in the third degree. General Statutes § 53a-254.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
35f0877d445824e1dc29aed0068e1aa4471135d92ec4ce5aee7fa25827578466
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.