Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 9.6-3

Interruption of Computer Services -- § 53a-251 (d) and §§ 53a-252 through 53a-256

activein force · 2007-12-01 – presentas-observed

Note: The various types of computer crime are defined in § 53a-251. The degree of the

offense is determined by the value of the property damaged or services stolen or interfered

with. See § 53a-252 (first degree: exceeds $10,000), § 53a-253 (second degree: exceeds

$5,000), § 53a-254 (third degree: exceeds $1,000), § 53a-255 (fourth degree: exceeds $500),

and § 53a-256 (fifth degree: does not exceed $500). In addition, the value of the property or

services is irrelevant if the defendant recklessly created a risk of serious physical injury, in

which case it is third degree (e.g., interfering with the computer system of a medical or

emergency organization).

The defendant is charged [in count__] with interruption of computer services in the (first /

second / third/ fourth / fifth) degree. The statute defining this crime reads in pertinent part as

follows:

a person is guilty of the computer crime of interruption of computer services when

(he/she), without authorization, intentionally or recklessly disrupts or degrades or

causes the disruption or degradation of computer services or denies or causes the

denial of computer services to an authorized user of a computer system.

[<Insert if appropriate:> For the purposes of this statute, “person” means a natural person,

corporation, limited liability company, trust, partnership, incorporated or unincorporated

association and any other legal or governmental entity, including any state or municipal entity or

public official. <Describe the status of the defendant as a person.>]

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - Interfered with the delivery of computer services

The first element is that the defendant <insert as appropriate:>

• (disrupted / degraded / caused the disruption of / caused the degradation of) computer

services. “Computer services” includes, but is not limited to, computer access, data

processing and data storage.

• (denied / caused to be denied) computer services to an authorized user of the computer

system. “Computer system” means a computer, its software, related equipment,

communications facilities, if any, and includes computer networks. “Computer” means a

programmable, electronic device capable of accepting and processing data. “Computer

network” means (A) a set of related devices connected to a computer by communications

facilities, or (B) a complex of two or more computers, including related devices,

connected by communications facilities.

<Describe specific allegations.>

Element 2 - Without authorization

The second element is that the defendant was not authorized to <insert specific allegations>.

Element 3 - Intent / Recklessness

The third element is that the defendant acted <insert as appropriate:>

• with the specific intent to <insert allegations>. A person acts “intentionally” with

respect to a result when (his/her) conscious objective is to cause such result. <See Intent:

Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>

• recklessly. A person acts “recklessly” with respect to a result or circumstances when

(he/she) is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that

such result will occur or that such circumstances exist. <See Recklessness, Instruction

2.3-4.>

Element 4 - Value of property or services / Risk of serious physical injury

[<If the state is alleging a dollar amount of damages:>

The fourth element is that the damage to or the value of the property or computer services

<insert according to degree charged:>

• First degree: exceeds $10,000.

• Second degree: exceeds $5,000.

• Third degree: exceeds $1,000.

• Fourth degree: exceeds $500.

• Fifth degree: is $500 or less.

The value of property or computer services is either 1) the market value of the property or

computer services at the time of the crime; or 2) if the property or computer services are

unrecoverable, damaged or destroyed as a result of the crime, the cost of reproducing or

replacing the property or computer services at the time of the crime. When the value of the

property or computer services or damage to the property or the services cannot be satisfactorily

ascertained, the value shall be deemed to be two hundred fifty dollars. The value of private

personal data shall be deemed to be one thousand five hundred dollars.

[<If there are multiple items and their values can be aggregated:> In making this determination,

you may add or aggregate the value of the property involved. You can only aggregate amounts if

the thefts were committed pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct,

whether from the same or several persons.2]

[<If the state is alleging reckless conduct:>

The fourth element is that the defendant engaged in conduct that created a risk of serious

physical injury to another person. A person acts “recklessly” with respect to a result or

circumstances when (he/she) is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and

unjustifiable risk that such result will occur or that such circumstances exist. <See Recklessness,

Instruction 2.3-4.>

“Serious physical injury” is something more serious than mere physical injury, which is defined

as “impairment of physical condition or pain.” It is more than a minor or superficial injury. It is

defined by statute as “physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes

serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function

of any bodily organ.”]

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant (disrupted

computer services / degraded computer service / denied computer services to an authorized user),

2) (he/she) was not authorized to do so, 3) (he/she) acted (intentionally / recklessly) and 4)

<insert the value of the damages or the allegations of recklessness>.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of interruption of computer services in the (first / second / third/ fourth / fifth)

degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that

the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find

the defendant not guilty.

1 General Statutes § 53a-259.

2 General Statutes § 53a-258.

3 Reckless conduct that creates a risk of serious physical injury to another person is computer

crime in the third degree. General Statutes § 53a-254.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
35f0877d445824e1dc29aed0068e1aa4471135d92ec4ce5aee7fa25827578466
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.