Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 9.1-8

Larceny by Obtaining Property by False

activein force · 2019-01-28 – presentas-observed

Promise -- § 53a-119 (3) and §§ 53a-122 through

53a-125b

Note: The degree of the larceny is determined by the value of the property stolen. See §

53a-122 (first degree); § 53a-123 (second degree); § 53a-124 (third degree); § 53a-125

(fourth degree); § 53a-125a (fifth degree); § 53a-125b (sixth degree). The dollar amounts

for the degrees of larceny were increased as of October 1, 2009. See the table in

Introduction to Larceny for the values in effect prior to that date.

The defendant is charged [in count__] with larceny by obtaining property by false promise in the

(first / second / third / fourth / fifth / sixth) degree. The statute defining this offense reads in

pertinent part as follows:

a person obtains property by false promise when, pursuant to a scheme to defraud,

(he/she) obtains property of another by means of a representation, express or implied,

that (he/she) or a third person will in the future engage in particular conduct, and

when (he/she) does not intend to engage in such conduct or does not believe that the

third person intends to engage in such conduct.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - Obtained property of another

The first element is that the defendant obtained property from the property owner.

“Obtaining” property includes, but is not limited to, bringing about the transfer of a legal interest

in the property from the owner to the defendant or to a third person. If the legal title or

ownership of the property or some legal interest in the property is transferred, such a transfer

would constitute “obtaining” under the statute. The property does not need to be physically

obtained. If the owner delivered the property intending to transfer legal ownership or some legal

interest in the property, sufficient transfer would have occurred.

“Property” includes any (money / personal property / real property / thing in action / evidence of

debt or contract / article of value of any kind). [Commodities of a public utility, such as gas,

electricity, steam and water also constitute property.]

“Owner” means not only the true or lawful owner, but any person who has a superior right to that

of the offender.

Element 2 - By false promise

The second element is that the defendant made a representation that (he/she) or some other

person would in the future engage in particular conduct. Not every prediction or statement about

the future will qualify as a promise under this definition. It must pertain to something to be done

in the future by the defendant or some other person. For example, a prediction that it will be a

nice day tomorrow would not be a promise under the statute. However, a statement that the

defendant or some third person will pay money or confer some other benefit upon another person

in return for some transfer of property would be a promise under this definition.

The representation or promise may be made in writing, verbally, or by actions or conduct. It

may be express, as where the words used contain all the terms of the promise. It may also be

implied, as where a person in a restaurant is served food on the assumption that (he/she) will pay

the bill, even though nothing is said specifically about payment at the time the order is taken.

Element 3 - Intent to defraud

The third element is that the defendant intended to defraud <insert name of person>. In other

words, (he/she) must have intended to deceive, and by this deceit, to obtain the property. <See

Intent to Defraud, Instruction 2.3-6.>

It is essential that the defendant had no honest intention of doing what (he/she) had promised [or

no honest belief that the third person intended to keep the promise]. A reckless or foolish

promise is not criminal unless there is no honest intention to keep it at the time the property is

obtained. The fact that the promise was not carried out is not by itself sufficient evidence for

you to determine that the defendant did not have the intention or belief that the promise would be

carried out.

Element 4 - Value of the property

The fourth element is that the property had a value that <insert as appropriate:>

First degree: exceeded $20,000.

Second degree: exceeded $10,000.

Third degree: exceeded $2,000.

Fourth degree: exceeded $1,000.

Fifth degree: exceeded $500.

Sixth degree: did not exceed $500.

<See Larceny, Instruction 9.1-1, for a full explanation of this element.>

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant wrongfully

obtained the property of another, 2) (he/she) obtained the property by a false promise, 3) (he/she)

intended to defraud the owner of the property, and 4) the value of the property obtained was

<insert value according to degree charged>.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of larceny by obtaining property by false promise, then you shall find the defendant

guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a

reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

1 If the victim is sixty years of age or older, is a conserved person, or is blind or physically

disabled, it is second degree larceny regardless of the value of the property. General Statutes §

53a-123 (a) (5). See Larceny of an Elderly, Conserved, Blind, or Physically Disabled Person,

Instruction 9.1-9.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
6ebbc78d314aa470f6249ef011598b88b128ba63dbd62d6d841c9fc11b7b5436
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.