Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 9.1-23

Larceny by Theft of Utility Service -- § 53a-119 (15) and §§ 53a-122 through 53a-125b

activein force · 2012-05-10 – presentas-observed

Note: The degree of the larceny is determined by the value of the property stolen. See §

53a-122 (first degree); § 53a-123 (second degree); § 53a-124 (third degree); § 53a-125

(fourth degree); § 53a-125a (fifth degree); § 53a-125b (sixth degree). The dollar amounts

for the degrees of larceny were increased as of October 1, 2009. See the table in

Introduction to Larceny for the values in effect prior to that date.

The defendant is charged [in count__] with larceny by theft of utility service in the (first / second

/ third / fourth / fifth / sixth) degree. The statute defining this offense reads in pertinent part as

follows:

a person is guilty of theft of utility service when (he/she) intentionally obtains

(electric / gas / water / telecommunications / wireless radio communications /

community antenna television service) that is available only for compensation

<insert appropriate subsection:>

• § 53a-119 (15) (A): by deception or threat or by false token, slug or other means

including, but not limited to, electronic or mechanical device or unauthorized use of a

confidential identification or authorization code or through fraudulent statements, to

avoid payment for the service by (himself/herself) or another person.

• § 53a-119 (15) (B): by tampering or making connection with or disconnecting the meter,

pipe, cable, conduit, conductor, attachment or other equipment or by manufacturing,

modifying, altering, programming, reprogramming or possessing any device, software or

equipment or part or component thereof or by disguising the identity or identification

numbers of any device or equipment utilized by a supplier of electric, gas, water,

telecommunications, wireless radio communications or community antenna television

service, without the consent of such supplier, in order to avoid payment for the service by

(himself/herself) or another person.

• § 53a-119 (15) (C): with intent to avoid payment by (himself/herself) or another person

for a prospective or already rendered service the charge or compensation for which is

measured by a meter or other mechanical measuring device provided by the supplier of

the service, by tampering with such meter or device or by attempting in any manner to

prevent such meter or device from performing its measuring function, without the

consent of the supplier of the service.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - Obtained utility service

The first element is that the defendant intentionally obtained (electric / gas / water /

telecommunications / wireless radio communications / community antenna television service)

that is available only for compensation. A person acts “intentionally” with respect to a result

when (his/her) conscious objective is to cause such result. <See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-

1.>

[<Insert if applicable:> The statute defining the offense of theft of utility service provides that

certain evidence, if believed, may be sufficient to establish intent. If you find that <insert as

appropriate:>

• any meter, pipe, cable, conduit, conductor, attachment or other equipment has been

tampered with or connected or disconnected,

• any device, software or equipment or part or component thereof has been modified,

altered, programmed, reprogrammed or possessed,

• the identity or identification numbers of any device or equipment utilized by the supplier

of the service have been disguised,

• a meter or other mechanical measuring device provided by the supplier of the service has

been tampered with or prevented from performing its measuring function,

without the consent of the supplier of the service, you may then find, but are not required to, that

the person to whom the service is billed has the intent to obtain the service and to avoid making

payment for the service.

1]

Element 2 - Means

The second element is that the defendant obtained such services by means of <insert specific

allegations and reread the relevant portion of the statute>.

Element 3 - Larcenous Intent

The third element is that at the time the defendant obtained the services, (he/she) intended to

avoid payment for such services. A person acts “intentionally” with respect to a result when

(his/her) conscious objective is to cause such result. <See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>

Element 4 - Value

The fourth element is that the services allegedly stolen had a value that <insert as appropriate:>

First degree: exceeded $20,000.

Second degree: exceeded $10,000.

Third degree: exceeded $2,000.

Fourth degree: exceeded $1,000.

Fifth degree: exceeded $500.

Sixth degree: did not exceed $500.

<See Larceny, Instruction 9.1-1, for a full explanation of this element.>

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant 1) intentionally

obtained (electric / gas / water / telecommunications / wireless radio communications /

community antenna television service) that is available only for compensation, 2) (he/she) did so

by means of <insert specific allegations>, 3) (he/she) intended to avoid payment for the services,

and 4) the value of the services was <insert value according to degree charged>.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of larceny by theft of utility service, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the

other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt

any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

1 The statute further provides that “[t]he presumption does not apply if the person to whose

service the condition applies has received such service for less than thirty-one days or until the

service supplier has made at least one meter or service reading and provided a billing statement

to the person as to whose service the condition applies. The presumption does not apply with

respect to wireless radio communications.”

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
bf2648010a7d73310d91c32f0a77a93d3dfc96e3285c28c4a2bca152986227ac
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 9.1-23 — Larceny by Theft of… · binding.law