Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 8.9-3

Aiding Escape of Mentally Ill or Drug Dependent Person

activein force · 2007-12-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant is charged [in count__] with aiding escape from a (hospital / sanitarium1). The

statute defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:

a person is guilty of aiding escape from a (hospital / sanitarium) when he aids the

escape from a (hospital / sanitarium) of any person committed thereto as (mentally ill

/ drug dependent).

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - Aided escape

The first element is that the defendant aided the escape of a person from a (hospital /sanitarium).

Aiding or abetting here have their ordinary meaning, that is, to intentionally help or assist. A

person acts “intentionally” with respect to a result when (his/her) conscious objective is to cause

such result. <See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>

“Escape” means the unlawful departure from the physical limits of custody.

Element 2 - Of mentally ill / drug dependent person

The second element is that the person whose escape was aided had been committed by a lawful

order to such institution as (mentally ill / drug dependent). The state does not have to prove that

such person was in fact (mentally ill / drug dependent), only that the person was committed as

(mentally ill / drug dependent).

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant aided the

escape of a person from a (hospital /sanitarium), and 2) that person had been committed to the

(hospital /sanitarium), as (mentally ill / drug dependent).

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of aiding the escape of a (mentally ill / drug dependent) person, then you shall find the defendant

guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a

reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

1 The statute uses the word “sanatorium.” “Sanitarium” is the proper American spelling of the

word. “Sanatorium” is a British variant spelling.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
531c5eeb56103baa66fbe4add8d5bb181bafeb41fa7a5d017e040c97153517a0
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.