CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 8.2-45
Illegal Possession of Large Capacity Magazine -- § 53-202w (c) (1)
The defendant is charged [in count __] with illegal possession of a large capacity magazine. The
statute defining this offense disallows any person from possessing a large capacity magazine if,
under state or federal law, that person is ineligible to possess a firearm.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt.
Element 1 – Possessed a large capacity magazine
The first element is that the defendant possessed a large capacity magazine. A “large capacity
magazine” is defined as any firearm magazine, belt, drum, feed strip or similar device that has
the capacity of, or can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than ten rounds of
ammunition.
“Possession” means either having the object on one’s person or otherwise having control over
the object, that is, knowing where it is and being able to access it.
Possession also requires that the defendant knew that (he/she) was in possession of the large
capacity magazine. That is, that (he/she) was aware that (he/she) was in possession of it and was
aware of its nature. The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew
that (he/she) was in possession of the large capacity magazine. <See Knowledge, Instruction 2.3-
3.>
<If some form of constructive possession is alleged, see Possession, Instruction 2.11-1.>
Element 2 – Ineligible to possess firearm
The second element is that at the time (he/she) possessed a large capacity magazine, the
defendant was not eligible, under state or federal law, to possess a firearm because (he/she)
<insert specific allegations and tailor to facts and evidence>. If the defendant was not legally
eligible to possess a firearm, then (his/her) possession of a large capacity magazine also was not
lawful.
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant 1) possessed a
large capacity magazine and 2) (he/she) was ineligible to possess a firearm at the time because
<insert specific allegations>.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt both of the elements
of the crime of illegal possession of a large capacity magazine, then you shall find the defendant
guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a
reasonable doubt either of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
________________________________________
1 General Statutes § 53-202w (a) (1). The following items do not qualify as a large capacity
magazine: “(A) A feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot
accommodate more than ten rounds of ammunition, (B) a .22 caliber tube ammunition feeding
device, (C) a tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action firearm, or (D) a magazine that
is permanently inoperable.” Id.
2 Ascertain from counsel what form of possession is alleged. The definition should be narrowly
tailored to the allegations.
3 Parties often will stipulate to the reason why the defendant is prohibited from possessing a
firearm. See Stipulations, Instruction 2.6-10.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
04e0e433f8881d4759760c3016e37f1cea597b7fbdb54c996dd8c409025551d2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.