Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 8.2-35

Transportation of Assault Weapon

activein force · 2007-12-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant is charged [in count__] with illegal transporting of an assault weapon. The statute

defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:

no person shall <insert as appropriate:>

• carry a loaded assault weapon concealed from public view.

• knowingly have, in any motor vehicle owned, operated, or occupied by (him/her) <insert

as appropriate:>

o a loaded assault weapon.

o an unloaded assault weapon unless such weapon is kept in the trunk of such vehicle

or in a case or other container which is inaccessible to the operator of or any

passenger in such vehicle.

This statute prohibits the transportation of assault weapons that are possessed legally pursuant to

a certificate of possession issued by the department of emergency services and public protection.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove beyond a reasonable

doubt that <insert as appropriate:>

• the defendant carried a loaded assault weapon concealed from public view.

• the defendant knowingly had a loaded assault weapon in a motor vehicle owned, operated

or occupied by him/her.

• the defendant knowingly had an unloaded assault weapon in a motor vehicle owned,

operated or occupied by him/her unless (a) such weapon was kept in the trunk of such

vehicle or (b) such weapon was kept in a case or container that was inaccessible to the

operator of or any passenger in such vehicle.

“Assault weapon” is defined by statute and includes <insert type of assault weapon>.

[<If allegations require knowledge: A person acts “knowingly” with respect to conduct or to a

circumstance when (he/she) is aware that (his/her) conduct is of such nature or that such

circumstance exists. <See Knowledge, Instruction 2.3-3.>]

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt <summarize allegations>.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the transportation of an assault weapon, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other

hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of

the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

1 The term assault weapon is defined to include specifically listed models of firearms as well as

firearms not specifically listed that have certain characteristics. The instruction should be

tailored to the type of assault weapon alleged in the case.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
8c9564f5a5a493d06464a070bbb391c59f4cc62f0994226756fd7e6a4c15045f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 8.2-35 — Transportation of As… · binding.law