Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 8.2-33

Sale or Transfer of Assault Weapon

activein force · 2024-01-31 – presentas-observed

The defendant is charged [in count__] with sale of an assault weapon. The statute defining this

offense reads in pertinent part as follows:

a person is guilty of the sale or transfer of an assault weapon when such person,

within this state, (distributes / transports or imports into this state / keeps for sale /

offers or exposes for sale / gives away) any assault weapon.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove beyond a reasonable

doubt the following elements:

Element 1 - Sold or transferred assault weapon

The first element is that the defendant (distributed / transported or imported into this state / kept

for sale / offered or exposed for sale / gave away) an assault weapon. “Assault weapon” is

defined by statute and includes <insert type of assault weapon>.

1 The terms (distribute /

transport / import / sale / give) have their ordinary meaning.

Element 2 - Within Connecticut

The second element is that the (distribution / transportation or importation / keeping for sale /

offering or exposing for sale / giving away) of the assault weapon took place within the state of

Connecticut. This means that the defendant’s conduct must have occurred within the state of

Connecticut.

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant (distributed /

transported or imported into this state / kept for sale / offered or exposed for sale / gave away) an

assault weapon within the state of Connecticut.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of the sale or transfer of an assault weapon, then you shall find the defendant guilty.

On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable

doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

1 “Assault weapon” is defined in § 53-202b to include specifically listed models of firearms as

well as firearms not specifically listed that have certain characteristics. The instruction should be

tailored to the type of assault weapon alleged in the case.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
ff51aa3fd8890ee6d2c43b5368c27fb8cb02e37f5dc0403f822973fefd20530c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.