Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 8.2-15

Possession of a Sawed-Off Shotgun or Silencer

activein force · 2015-11-17 – presentas-observed

The defendant is charged [in count__] with the possession of a (sawed-off shotgun / silencer).

The statute defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:

a person is guilty of possession of a (sawed-off shotgun / silencer) when (he/she)

(owns / controls / possesses) any (sawed-off shotgun / silencer).

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove beyond a reasonable

doubt that the defendant (owned / controlled / possessed) a (sawed-off shotgun / silencer).

<Insert the appropriate definition:>

• A “sawed-off shotgun” is a shotgun with a barrel that measures less than eighteen inches

or an overall length of less than twenty-six inches. You must find that the shotgun was

operable at the time the defendant possessed it.

• A silencer is any instrument, attachment, weapon or appliance for causing the firing of

any gun, revolver, pistol, or other firearm to be silent, or intended to lessen or muffle the

noise of the firing of any gun, revolver, pistol, or other firearm.

“Possession” means either having the (substance / object) on one’s person or otherwise having

control over the (substance / object), that is, knowing where it is and being able to access it.2

Possession also requires that the defendant knew that (he/she) was in possession of the firearm.

That is, that (he/she) was aware that (he/she) was in possession of it and was aware of its nature.

The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew that (he/she) was in

possession of the firearm. <See Knowledge, Instruction 2.3-3.>

<If some form of constructive possession is alleged, see Possession, Instruction 2.11-1.>

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant (owned /

controlled / possessed) a (sawed-off shotgun / silencer).

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of possession of a (sawed-off shotgun / silencer), then you shall find the defendant

guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a

reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

1 “Shotgun” is incorporated in the definition of “firearm,” which requires that the firearm be

operable. See glossary entry for pistol or revolver.

2 Ascertain from counsel what form of possession is alleged. The definition should be narrowly

tailored to the allegations.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
a4f1eb066d99f2f3a31ab859a0c2d1c062caf3117ce025c2ecd11ccd9fc6fc50
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 8.2-15 — Possession of a Sawe… · binding.law