Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 8.1-3

Illegal Distribution of a Controlled Substance to a Minor -- § 21a-278a (a)

activein force · 2007-12-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant is charged [in count__] with the illegal distribution of a controlled substance to a

minor. The statute defining this offense imposes penalties on any person eighteen years of age

or older who is not, at the time, a drug-dependent person,1 and who (distributes / sells / offers /

gives)2 any controlled substance to another person who is under eighteen years of age and is at

least two years younger than the defendant.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - Distributed a controlled substance

The first element is that the defendant (distributed / sold / offered / gave) a controlled substance,

specifically <insert specific substance>,

3 to another person.

Element 2 - Age of defendant

The second element is that the defendant was eighteen years of age or older at the time of the

alleged offense.

Element 3 - Age of other person

The third element is that at the time of the alleged offense the person to whom the <insert

specific substance> was (distributed / sold / offered / given) was under eighteen years of age and

at least two years younger than the defendant.

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant (distributed /

sold / offered / gave) <insert type of substance>, 2) the defendant was at least 18 years of age at

the time, and 3) the person to whom the <insert type of substance> was (distributed / sold /

offered / given) to was under the age of 18 and at least 2 years younger than the defendant.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of the distribution of a controlled substance, then you shall find the defendant guilty.

On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable

doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

1 Non-drug-dependency is not an element of the crime. See Affirmative Defense of Drug

Dependency, Instruction 8.1-4.

2 See Drug Transactions in the Introduction to this section.

3 See Defining the Controlled Substance in the Introduction to this section.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
5c084c1d2e5fa03a023d6180f5dfd630590bbdf06f29962a09ca5332f6edef9d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.