CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 8.1
Introduction to Drug Offenses
Drug Transactions
The statutes in Title 21, Chapter 420b, Dependency-Producing Drugs, define the entire
regulatory scheme for controlled substances, encompassing a broad range of prohibited acts from
illegal street sales to improper dispensing of such substances by doctors or pharmacists. The
statutes criminalizing the distribution of controlled substances (§§ 21a-277, 21a-278a, and 21a-
278a) include numerous verbs that describe the variety of transactions that may be punishable.
They are:
• manufactures
• distributes
• sells
• prescribes
• dispenses
• compounds
• transports with the intent to sell or dispense
• possesses with the intent to sell or dispense
• offers
• gives
• administers to another person
Note that § 21a-278a incorporates § 21a-277 and § 21a-278 but specifies a limited subset
of applicable transactions.
Of these, “administer,” “prescribe,” and “dispense” are defined in § 21a-240 in a very
specialized manner that applies to practitioners, which includes doctors, pharmacists, scientific
investigators, etc. See § 21a-240 (43). In State v. Jackson, 13 Conn. App. 288, 297 (1988), the
information charged the defendant with “possession with the intent to sell or dispense.” As the
statutory definition of “dispense” makes reference to practitioners, which was not applicable to
the defendant, the trial court instructed on the ordinary meaning of the word “dispense.” The
Appellate Court said that this was improper when there was an applicable statutory definition.
These verbs should, therefore, only be used in a case involving a practitioner.
Because the trial court is primarily faced with illegal street sales, the instructions in this
section are limited to “sells” and “possesses with the intent to sell.”
The definition of “sale” in § 21a-240 (5) encompasses a broad range of transactions. See
State v. Webster, 308 Conn. 43, 54-55 (2013) (sales includes offers to sell and attempts to
transfer narcotics; there is no requirement that a drug transaction be completed before liability
may be imposed); State v. Wassil, 233 Conn. 174, 193 (1995) (a gift of narcotics comes within
the meaning of the statutory definition of sale).
Defining the Controlled Substance
“Controlled substance” is defined as any “drug, substance, or immediate precursor in
schedules I to V, inclusive, of the Connecticut controlled substance scheduling regulations
adopted pursuant to section 21a-243.” There are numerous controlled substances within these
schedules. The trial court should ascertain which controlled substance is alleged. If the
substance is within such schedules, the court may instruct that if the jury finds it proved that the
substance is what it is alleged to be, it is included within the definition of a controlled substance.
State v. Nieves, 186 Conn. 26, 31 (1982); State v. Vessichio, 197 Conn. 644, 650 (1985), cert.
denied, 475 U.S. 1122, 106 S. Ct. 1642, 90 L. Ed. 2d 187 (1986); State v. Kiser, 43 Conn. App.
339, 359-60, cert. denied, 239 Conn. 945 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1190, 117 S. Ct. 1478,
137 L. Ed. 2d 690 (1997).
In some cases, the parties may stipulate to the nature of the substance. See Stipulations,
Instruction 2.6-10.
There are statutory definitions for the following substances, which the court may
incorporate into the instructions as appropriate, depending on the nature of the substances alleged
in the information:
• Amphetamine-type substances
• Barbiturate-type drugs
• Cannabis-type substances
• Cocaine in a free-base form
• Hallucinogenic substances
• Marijuana
• Narcotic substance
• Opiate
• Opium poppy
• Other stimulant and depressant drugs
• Poppy straw
In some cases, the quantity of the substance determines the punishment. In these cases
the jury will have to make a determination that a certain amount of a given substance was
involved. Note that effective July 1, 2011, the possession of less than one-half ounce of a
cannabis-type substance is an infraction.
Lesser included offenses
Distribution of any controlled substance other than marijuana (§ 21a-277) is a lesser
included offense of distribution of certain quantities of specified controlled substances (§ 21a-
278). State v. Bradley, 60 Conn. App. 534, 546, cert. denied, 255 Conn. 921 (2000).
Possession (§ 21a-279) is a lesser included offense of possession with intent to sell (§
21a-277) as long as the substances are the same. State v. Johnson, 137 Conn. App. 733, 753
(2012), rev’d on other grounds, 316 Conn. 34 (2015).
Possession of narcotics (§ 21a-279) and possession of narcotics within 1500 feet of a
school (§ 21a-279 (d)) are separate offenses. State v. Otto, 50 Conn. App. 1, 20, cert. denied,
247 Conn. 927 (1998). But possession of cocaine under § 21a-279 (a) is a lesser included
offense of possession of cocaine with intent to sell under § 21a-278 (b) and possession with
intent to sell within 1500 feet of a school under § 21a-279 (d). State v. Barnes, 47 Conn. App.
590, 592 (1998).
Multiple offenses
Possession of two narcotic substances at the same time does not constitute two separate
offenses under § 21a-279 (a). State v. Rawls, 198 Conn. 111 (1985).
Distribution
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
114b68416bcb2685d843f1be9897da9898dbb69d80ca6caae823cdb72bbf6331
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.