CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 7.8-1
Failure to Comply with Sex Offender
Registration Requirements -- § 54-251 (e), § 54-252
(d), § 54-253 (e), and § 54-254 (b)
Revised November 6, 2014
The defendant is charged [in count__] with failure to comply with sex offender registration
requirements. The law requires that persons who are convicted or found not guilty by reason of
mental disease or defect of certain sex offenses and who are released into the community must
register (his/her) name, identifying factors, criminal history record, residence address and
electronic mail address, instant message address or other similar Internet communication
identifier, if any, with the commissioner of emergency services and public protection. (He/She)
must notify the commissioner without undue delay of any change in (his/her) status whenever the
person <insert as appropriate:>
• changes (his/her) name,
• changes (his/her) residence
1 address,
• changes or establishes (his/her) electronic mail address, instant message address or other
similar Internet communication identifier,
• is employed at, carries on a vocation at or is a student at a trade or professional institution
or institution of higher learning in this state,
• is employed in another state,
• carries on a vocation in another state,
• is a student in another state,
In addition, (he/she) must complete and return forms mailed to (him/her) to verify (his/her)
address and must submit to the retaking of a photographic image upon the request of the
commissioner.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Convicted of certain crime
The first element is that the defendant was convicted of <insert crime>. The state alleges that
the defendant was convicted of <insert crime> on <insert date>.
Element 2 - Required to register
The second element is that the defendant was required to register with the department of
emergency services and public protection as a sex offender. I instruct you as a matter of law that
a person convicted of <insert crime> and released into the community is required to register as a
sex offender.
Element 3 - Released into the community
The third element is that the defendant was released into the community. The state alleges that
the defendant was released on <insert date>.
Element 4 - Failed to comply with registration requirements
The fourth element is that after being released to the community the defendant failed to comply
with the registration requirements. The state alleges that the defendant failed to <insert specific
allegations>.
[<If the violation is failing to report a change in circumstances:> The defendant claims that
(he/she) satisfied the timing requirements in that the <describe the nature of the change>
occurred on <date> and he reported to the registry on <date>. A registrant must report a change
within 5 business days of the change. Business days are those days when the registry is open.]2
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant 1) was convicted
of <insert crime>, 2) was required to register as a sex offender, 3) was released into the
community, and 4) did not comply with the registration requirements.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of failure to comply with sex offender registration requirements, then you shall find
the defendant guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to
prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not
guilty.
1 “Residence” means where a person lives for some time, but does not mean a temporary stay.
For a thorough discussion of the meaning of “residence,” including travelling and homelessness,
see State v. Drupals, 306 Conn. 149, 161-65 (2012); see also State v. Winer, 112 Conn. App.
458, 465 (homelessness does not relieve a defendant of the duty to register), cert. denied, 292
Conn. 903 (2009).
2 A registrant is expected to report a change of circumstances on the next business day, but
criminal penalties do not apply unless the registrant fails to notify the registry within five
business days of the obligation to do so. “The use of the phrase ‘undue delay’ indicates that the
legislature ‘intended to make alloweance for the vagaries of individual conditions.” State v.
Drupals, 306 Conn. 149, 166-71 (2012).
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
d1860742372bc148cbc278fd0dd95681acf8216bdcdd1de838edbc3525a8d909
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.