CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 7.6-5
Harmful Communication with a Minor – § 53a-196j (b) (1)
The defendant is charged [in count __] with harmful communication with a minor. The statute
defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
A person, who is twenty-five years of age or older, is guilty of harmful
communication with a minor when such person uses an interactive computer service
or text message to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to share a
photographic or other recorded image of the minor for the purpose of providing
sexual gratification to the person who requests that the image be shared.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 – Age of Defendant
The first element is that at the time of the alleged offense, the defendant had attained the age of
twenty-five years or older.
Element 2 - Use of Interactive Computer Service/Text Message to Obtain Photographic
Image from Minor
The second element is that the defendant used (an interactive computer service / a text message)
to (persuade / induce / entice / coerce) a minor to share a photographic or other recorded image
of the minor.
“Interactive computer service” means any information service, system or access software
provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server,
including specifically a service or system that provides access to the internet and such systems
operated or services offered by libraries or educational institutions.1
“Text message” means an electronic communication typically sent and received by mobile
phone.
“Minor” means any person under eighteen years of age, or whom the actor reasonably believes to
be under eighteen years of age.2
“Persuade” means to prevail on a person to do something, as by advising or urging.
“Entice” means to lead on by exciting hope or desire.
“Induce” means to lead or move by persuasion or influence, as to some action or state of mind.
“Coerce” means to compel by force, intimidation, or authority, especially without regard for
individual desire or volition.3
“Share” means an act of sending or causing to be delivered, including by affirmatively granting
the receiver access to the originator’s files.4
“Recorded image” means any visual depiction, including digital, film, or videotape, or data
stored on computer disc or by electronic means which is capable of conversion into a visual
image. It also includes encrypted data.
Element 3 – Knowingly
The third element is that the defendant knowingly (persuaded / induced / enticed / coerced) the
minor to share the image.
A person acts “knowingly” with respect to conduct or a circumstance when (he/she) is aware that
(his/her) conduct is of such a nature or that such circumstance exists. <See Knowledge,
Instruction 2.3-3.>
Element 4 - Sexual gratification
The fourth element is that the defendant obtained the photographic or other recorded image from
the minor for the purpose of providing the defendant sexual gratification.
“Purpose” means the defendant’s conscious objective was to cause such result. <See Intent:
Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>
“Sexual gratification” has no technical or unusual meaning. It denotes that which is sexually
stimulating, pleasing, or satisfying. To determine whether the defendant acted with purpose to
sexually gratify (himself/herself), you may consider the defendant’s conduct and the surrounding
circumstances and draw any reasonable and logical inferences. Sexual gratification, like intent,
is rarely capable of proof by direct evidence and usually must be inferred from the
circumstances. Circumstantial evidence is sufficient to prove that the defendant obtained the
photographic or other recorded image of the minor for the purpose of providing the defendant
sexual gratification, provided that the inferences drawn comply with the standards for inferences
as explained in my instruction on circumstantial evidence. Whether the defendant acted with the
purpose to provide sexual gratification to (himself/herself) is a question of fact for you to
determine.
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant had attained
the age of twenty-five years or older; 2) (he/she) used (an interactive computer service / a text
message) to (persuade / induce / entice / coerce) a minor into sharing a photographic or other
recorded image; 3) (he/she) did so knowingly; and 4) (he/she) did so for the purpose of providing
(himself/herself) sexual gratification.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of harmful communication with a minor, then you shall find the defendant guilty.
On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable
doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
_________________________________________
1 General Statutes § 53a-196j (a) (2); General Statutes § 53a-90a.
2 General Statutes § 53a-196j (a) (1). This language appears designed for allegations involving
law enforcement playing the role of a minor in an undercover capacity.
3 See Dictionary.com for each of the foregoing definitions.
4 Cf. Smith v. State, 204 So.3d 18, 21-22 (Fla. 2016).
5 Cf. 18 U. S. C. § 2256 (5); United States v. Philips, 54 F.4th 374 (6th Cir. 2022).
6 The statute does not require that the images be pornographic or contain nudity.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
be7aee65ba64c0f58673f5827a4253118b262f3f36b3ac784ae2817404279fec
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.