CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 7.6-1
Enticing a Minor
Note: This instruction is for crimes committed on or after October 1, 2016. Public Act No.
16-71, § 9, changed the age elements for this offense. For the instruction for crimes
committed before October 1, 2016, see Instruction 7.6-1 (archived).
The defendant is charged [in count__] with using a computer to entice a minor into sexual
activity. The statute defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of enticing a minor when such person uses an interactive computer
service to knowingly (persuade / induce / entice / coerce) any person (1) under
eighteen years of age, or (2) who the actor reasonably believes to be under eighteen
years of age, to engage in (prostitution / sexual activity) for which the actor may be
charged with a criminal offense.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Enticed a minor into prostitution or sexual activity
The first element is that the defendant knowingly (persuaded / induced / enticed / coerced)
another person into engaging in (prostitution / sexual activity). <Insert appropriate definition:>
• Prostitution is defined as engaging or agreeing or offering to engage in sexual conduct
with another person in return for a fee.
1 “Sexual conduct” means behavior involving sex,
the organs of sex and their functions or the instincts and drives associated with sex.2 A
“fee” is any form of compensation or payment.
• Sexual activity. “Sexual activity” means conduct or behavior involving sex, the organs
of sex and their functions or the instincts and drives associated with sex.3
A person acts “knowingly” with respect to conduct or to a circumstance when (he/she) is aware
that (his/her) conduct is of such nature or that such circumstance exists. <See Knowledge,
Instruction 2.3-3.>
Element 2 - Age
The second element is that at the time of the incident, <insert as appropriate:>
• the other person was under the age of (thirteen / eighteen). This means that the person
had not yet had (his/her) (thirteenth / eighteenth) birthday when the conduct is alleged to
have taken place.
• the defendant reasonably believed the other person to be under the age of eighteen. This
means that the defendant reasonably believed that the person had not yet had (his/her)
eighteenth birthday when the conduct is alleged to have taken place.
Element 3 - Prostitution / Sexual activity
The third element is that the sexual activity which the defendant (persuaded / induced / enticed /
coerced) the other person to engage in is one for which the defendant may be charged with a
criminal offense. It is not necessary that the defendant actually be charged with such an offense,
but simply that the sexual activity in which the defendant intended to engage is proscribed or
prohibited by law. <Insert the particular conduct, including prostitution, which the state claims
and the evidence supports as the sexual activity in which the defendant intended to have the
minor engage, and the criminal charge(s) that it would support.>4
Element 4 - Computer
The fourth element is that the defendant used an interactive computer service to accomplish this
activity. As defined by this statute, an “interactive computer service” means any information
service, system or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple
users to a computer server, including specifically a service or system that provides access to the
Internet and such systems operated or services offered by libraries or educational institutions.5
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant enticed
another person to engage in (prostitution / sexual activity), 2) that other person was under 16
years of age, 3) the sexual activity is one for which the defendant could be criminally liable, and
4) the defendant used an interactive computer system.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of the use of a computer to entice a child into sexual activity, then you shall find the
defendant guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove
beyond a reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
1 See Prostitution, Instruction 7.3-1.
2 See State v. Allen, 37 Conn. Supp. 506, 510-11 (App. Sess. 1980).
3 The statutes concerning prostitution and pornography use both the terms “sexual activity” and
“sexual conduct.” They do not seem to be readily distinguishable.
4 The court should inquire of the state what the underlying criminal offense(s) are being claimed
if not expressly contained in the information.
5 General Statutes § 53a-90a (a).
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
e862e1632da82067099ac4b52ba814f85f1b20b23d8f68fb10e3e680be06576a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.