CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 7.3-4
Promoting Prostitution in the First Degree (Coercion) -- § 53a-86 (a) (1)
The defendant is charged [in count__] with promoting prostitution in the first degree. The statute
defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of promoting prostitution in the first degree when (he/she)
knowingly <insert one of the following:>
• advances prostitution by compelling a person by force or intimidation to engage in
prostitution.
• profits from coercive conduct by another in compelling a person by force or intimidation
to engage in prostitution.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Knowingly advanced or profited from prostitution
The first element is that the defendant knowingly (advanced / profited from) prostitution. A
person acts “knowingly” with respect to conduct or to a circumstance when (he/she) is aware that
(his/her) conduct is of such nature or that such circumstance exists. <See Knowledge, Instruction
2.3-3.>
<Insert one of the following:>
• A person “advances prostitution” when, acting other than as a prostitute or as a patron
thereof, (he/she) knowingly causes or aids a person to commit or engage in prostitution,
procures or solicits patrons for prostitution, provides persons or premises for prostitution
purposes, operates or assists in the operation of a house of prostitution or a prostitution
enterprise, or engages in any other conduct designed to institute, aid or facilitate an act or
enterprise of prostitution.
• A person “profits from prostitution” when, acting other than as a prostitute receiving
compensation for personally rendered prostitution services, (he/she) accepts or receives
money or other property pursuant to an agreement or understanding with any person
whereby (he/she) participates or is to participate in the proceeds of prostitution activity.
Element 2 - By means of force or coercion
The second element is that <insert name of person> was compelled by force or intimidation to
engage in prostitution. Therefore, some element of compulsion such as force, intimidation, or
coercive conduct must be present. <Insert facts of alleged coercion.>
[<If defendant charged under (a) (2):> The defendant does not have to have applied the coercive
force (himself/herself). It is sufficient if (he/she) profits in any way from another person’s
coercive conduct.]
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant knowingly
(advanced / profited from) prostitution, and 2) (he/she) did so by means of force or intimidation.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of promoting prostitution, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other
hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of
the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
5d20149cf4d52039048b423b309ddc422778f97d51986abba21653a4da13100b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.