CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 7.3-3
Patronizing a Prostitute from Motor Vehicle
The defendant is charged [in count__] with patronizing a prostitute from a motor vehicle. The
statute defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of patronizing a prostitute from a motor vehicle when (he/she),
while occupying a motor vehicle: <insert appropriate subsection:>
• § 53a-83a (a) (1): pursuant to a prior understanding, pays a fee to another person as
compensation for such person or a third person having engaged in sexual conduct with
(him/her).
• § 53a-83a (a) (2): pays or agrees to pay a fee to another person pursuant to an
understanding that in return therefore such person or a third person will engage in sexual
conduct with (him/her).
• § 53a-83a (a) (3): solicits or requests another person to engage in sexual conduct with
(him/her) in return for a fee.
• § 53a-83a (a) (4): engages in sexual conduct for which a fee was paid or agreed to be
paid.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Occupied motor vehicle
The first element is that the defendant occupied a motor vehicle. “Motor vehicle” means all
vehicles used on a public highway and includes an automobile.
Element 2 - Patronized a prostitute
The second element is that while occupying a motor vehicle, the defendant <specify the alleged
conduct>. Sexual conduct has its ordinary meaning, that is, conduct of a sexual nature.
2 The
respective sex of the defendant and other person is immaterial.
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant occupied a
motor vehicle, and 2) while in the motor vehicle <summarize allegations>.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of patronizing a prostitute from a motor vehicle, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the
other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
1 The three alternative ways of committing this offense vary in the timing of the transaction and
whether a third party procurer is involved. The gist of the crime is the agreement to pay a fee for
sexual services. Tailor the instruction to the facts alleged.
2 See State v. Allen, 37 Conn. Supp. 506, 510-11 (App. Sess. 1980).
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
368a201f1083035612f72006de2868f2d354a1f53e2ed162d77632ce354ea93e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.