CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.7-4
Harassment in the First Degree
The defendant is charged [in count__] with harassment in the first degree. The statute defining
this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of harassment in the first degree when, with the intent to harass,
annoy, alarm, or terrorize another person, (he/she) threatens to kill or physically
injure that person or any other person, and communicates such threat by telephone, or
by telegraph, mail, computer network or any other form of written communication, in
a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm and has been convicted of <insert
specified felony>.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Intent
The first element is that the defendant had the specific intent to harass, annoy, alarm, or
terrorize
2 another person. A person acts “intentionally” with respect to a result when (his/her)
conscious objective is to cause such result. <See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>
“Harass” means to trouble, worry or torment. “Annoy” means to irritate, vex, bother as by
repeated action. “Alarm” means to make suddenly afraid, anxious, or frightened. “Terrorize”
means to cause intense fear or apprehension.
Element 2 - Threat
The second element is that the defendant threatened to kill or physically injure that person or any
other person.
Element 3 - Communicated threat
The third element is that the defendant communicated such threat by telephone, or by telegraph,
mail, email or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance
or alarm. <Describe specific allegations.>
Element 4 - Prior conviction
The fourth element is that the defendant had previously been convicted of a felony. “Felony” is
an offense for which a person may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment in excess of one year.
“Convicted” means having a judgment of conviction entered by a court of competent
jurisdiction.
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant intended to
harass, annoy, alarm or terrorize <insert name of person>, 2) the defendant threatened to kill or
physically injure <insert name of person>, 3) the threat was communicated by means of <insert
means of making threat>, and 4) the defendant had previously been convicted of a felony.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of harassment in the first degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the
other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
1 To be convicted of a violation of § 53a-182b, the defendant must have previously been
convicted of a capital felony, a class A felony, a class B felony, except a conviction under
section 53a-86 or 53a-122, a class C felony, except a conviction under section 53a-87, 53a-152
or 53a-153, or a class D felony under sections 53a-60 to 53a-60c, inclusive, 53a-72a, 53a-72b,
53a-95, 53a-103, 53a-103a, 53a-114, 53a-136 or 53a-216.
2 State v. Marsala, 43 Conn. App. 527, 540 (1996) (these words are not conceptually distinct),
cert. denied, 239 Conn. 957 (1997).
3 State v. Dyson, 238 Conn. 784, 798-99 (1996); State v. Crudup, 81 Conn. App. 248, 261, cert.
denied, 268 Conn. 913 (2004).
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
b18489b5f0c575ca82d569f74eb90919213e8bee599354b502011b93977de93b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.