Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.11-4

Sale or Buying of a Child -- § 53-21 (a) (3)

activein force · 2007-12-01 – presentas-observed

Note: This statute criminalizes both sides of the transaction. Tailor the instruction to

specify whether it is the seller or the buyer being prosecuted.

The defendant is charged [in count__] with sale of a minor child. The statute defining this

offense imposes punishment on any person who <insert as appropriate:>

• permanently transfers the legal or physical custody of a child under the age of sixteen

years to another person for money or other valuable consideration.

• acquires or receives the legal or physical custody of a child under the age of sixteen years

from another person upon payment of money or other valuable consideration to such

other person or a third person.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - Age of child

The first element is that at the time of the incident, the child was under the age of sixteen years.

This means that the child had not yet had (his/her) sixteenth birthday.

Element 2 - Custody transferred

The second element is that the defendant <insert as appropriate:>

• transferred the legal or physical custody of the child to another person.

acquired or received the legal or physical custody of the child from another person.

<Insert specific allegations of transaction.>

Element 3 - For consideration

The third element is that <insert as appropriate:>

• the transfer was for money or other valuable consideration.

• the acquisition or receipt was made upon payment of money or other valuable

consideration to another person.

<Insert specific allegations of consideration.>

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the child involved in the

transaction was under 16 years of age, 2) the defendant <insert specific allegations of

transaction>, and 3) (the transfer was made for money or other valuable consideration / the child

was acquired upon the payment of money or other valuable consideration to <insert name of

person>.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the sale of a minor child, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other hand, if you

unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the

elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
edbe9a827f1213dd733380c434f62f068c05fb26ad4be7d4cad69a2735fc1007
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.