CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.11-11
Enticing a Juvenile to Commit a Criminal Act
Note: This instruction is for crimes committed on or after October 1, 2021.
The defendant is charged [in count__] with enticing a juvenile to commit a criminal act. The
statute defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
A person is guilty of enticing a juvenile to commit a criminal act if such person is
twenty-three years of age or older and knowingly (causes / encourages / solicits /
recruits / intimidates / coerces) a person under eighteen years of age to commit or
participate in the commission of a criminal act.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Twenty-three years of age
The first element is that the defendant was twenty-three years of age or older at the time of the
alleged offense. This means that the defendant had already reached his twenty-third birthday
when the conduct at issue is alleged to have taken place.
Element 2 - Enticed juvenile to commit or participate in criminal act
The second element is that the defendant (caused / encouraged / solicited / recruited / intimidated
/ coerced) a person under eighteen years of age to (commit / participate in the commission of) a
criminal act.
This means that the person whom the defendant (caused / encouraged / solicited / recruited /
intimidated / coerced) had not yet reached (his/her) eighteenth birthday when the conduct is
alleged to have taken place.
“Criminal act” means conduct constituting a felony or a misdemeanor, which are offenses for
which a person may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment.
1 <Insert alleged crime> is a
(felony / misdemeanor).
Element 3 - Knowingly
The third element is that the defendant knowingly (caused /encouraged / solicited / recruited /
intimidated / coerced) such person to (commit / participate in the commission of) a crime.
A person acts “knowingly” with respect to conduct or to a circumstance when (he/she) is aware
that (his/her) conduct is of such nature or that such circumstance exists. <See Knowledge,
Instruction 2.3-3.>
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant was twenty-three years of age or older, 2) the defendant (caused / encouraged / solicited / recruited /
intimidated / coerced) a person under eighteen years of age to (commit / participate in the
commission of) a criminal act, and 3) the defendant did so knowingly.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of enticing a juvenile to commit a criminal act, then you shall find the defendant
guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a
reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
1 General Statutes § 53a-224 (a) (2).
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
fd02c7c1eac13e59ddcefa84c496b86f7c62a11146f7775e702c836f2a22e798
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.