CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.11-10
Knowingly Failing to Report Disappearance of Child -- § 53-21a (d)
The defendant is charged [in Count __] with knowingly failing to report the disappearance of a
child to an appropriate law enforcement agency. The statute defining this offense reads in
pertinent part as follows:
Any parent, guardian or person having custody or control, or providing supervision,
of any child under the age of twelve years who knowingly fails to report the
disappearance of such child to an appropriate law enforcement agency shall be guilty
of knowingly failing to report the disappearance of a child.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the state must prove each of the following
elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Position of responsibility
The first element is that the defendant was a parent, guardian, or a person having custody and
control or providing supervision of the child.
Element 2 - Child under age of twelve
The second element is that the child was under the age of twelve years at the time of the alleged
offense. This means that the child had not yet reached (his/her) twelfth birthday.
Element 3 –Failure to Report Child’s Disappearance to Appropriate Law Enforcement
Agency
The third element is that the defendant failed to report the disappearance of a child to an
appropriate law enforcement agency.
“Disappearance of such child” means that the parent, guardian or person does not know the
location of the child and has not had contact with the child for a twenty-four-hour period.
An appropriate law enforcement agency is a local, state or federal law enforcement agency
having jurisdiction over the location at which the child was last seen or known to be present.
Element 4 – Knowingly
The fourth element is that the defendant knowingly failed to report the child’s disappearance to
an appropriate law enforcement agency.
A person acts “knowingly” with respect to conduct or a circumstance when (he/she) is aware that
(his/her) conduct is of such nature or that such circumstance exists. <See Knowledge, Instruction
2.3-3.>
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant was (the
child’s parent / the child’s guardian / a person who had custody or control or provided
supervision over the child), 2) the child was under the age of twelve, 3) the defendant failed to
report the disappearance of such child to an appropriate law enforcement agency and 4) the
defendant did so knowingly.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of knowingly failing to report the disappearance of a child to an appropriate law enforcement
agency, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that
the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find
the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
ab863eccb256ef77276a415f2c30fc393867a9fb430600e71f42b5044445d2ba
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.